Literature DB >> 12778588

Effects of feeding silage and grain from glyphosate-tolerant or insect-protected corn hybrids on feed intake, ruminal digestion, and milk production in dairy cattle.

S S Donkin1, J C Velez, A K Totten, E P Stanisiewski, G F Hartnell.   

Abstract

Lactating dairy cows were used to determine effects of feeding glyphosate-tolerant or insect-protected corn hybrids on feed intake, milk production, milk composition, and ruminal digestibility. Corn resistant to European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) infestation (Bt-MON810), or its nontransgenic control (Bt-CON), were planted in alternating fields during two successive years. One-half of each strip was harvested for whole plant corn silage and the remainder was allowed to mature and harvested as grain. Effects of feeding diets containing either Bt-MON810 or Bt-CON grain and silage were determined in two experiments (1 and 2) conducted during successive years. In experiment 3, glyphosate-tolerant Roundup Ready corn (RR-GA21) or its nontransgenic control (RR-CON) corn were grown in alternating fields during one cropping season. Diets contained 42 to 60% corn silage and 20 to 34% corn grain from Bt-MON810, RR-GA21, or the appropriate nontransgenic counterpart; treatments were applied using a switchback design. Cows were fed ad libitum and milked twice daily. There were no differences for nutrient composition between silage sources or between grain sources within an experiment. Data for experiments 1 and 2 indicated similar dry matter intake (DMI), 4% fat-corrected milk (FCM) production, and milk composition between Bt-MON810 and Bt-CON diets. There were no differences for DMI, 4% FCM production, and milk composition between RR-GA21 and RR-CON diets. There was no difference in ruminal degradability, determined separately for corn silage and corn grain, for RR-GA21 or Bt-MON810-hybrids compared with their respective controls. These data demonstrate equivalence of nutritional value and production efficiency for corn containing Bt-MON810 compared with its control and for RR-GA21 corn compared with its control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12778588     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73763-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  A comparative risk assessment of genetically engineered, mutagenic, and conventional wheat production systems.

Authors:  Robert K D Peterson; Leslie M Shama
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

Review 3.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Weight of the evidence: independent research projects confirm industry conclusions on the safety of insect-protected maize MON 810.

Authors:  Jay S Petrick; Erin Bell; Michael S Koch
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.074

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.