Literature DB >> 12778554

A comparison of five hybrid zones of the weta Hemideina thoracica (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae): degree of cytogenetic differentiation fails to predict zone width.

Mary Morgan-Richards1, Graham P Wallis.   

Abstract

Tension zones are maintained by the interaction between selection against hybrids and dispersal of individuals. Investigating multiple hybrid zones within a single species provides the opportunity to examine differences in zone structure on a background of differences in extrinsic factors (e.g., age of the zone, ecology) or intrinsic factors (e.g., chromosomes). The New Zealand tree weta Hemideina thoracica comprises at least eight distinct chromosomal races with diploid numbers ranging from 2n = 11 (XO) to 2n = 23 (XO). Five independent hybrid zones were located that involve races differing from one another by a variety of chromosomal rearrangements. The predicted negative correlation between extent of karyotypic differentiation (measured in terms of both percent of genome and number of rearrangements) and zone width was not found. Conversely, the widest zones were those characterized by two chromosome rearrangements involving up to 35% of the genome. The narrowest zone occurred where the two races differ by a single chromosome rearrangement involving approximately 2% of the genome. The five estimates of chromosomal cline width ranged from 0.5 km to 47 km. A comparative investigation of cline width for both chromosomal and mitochondrial markers revealed a complex pattern of zone characteristics. Three of the five zones in this study showed cline concordance for the nuclear and cytoplasmic markers, and at two of the zones the clines were also coincident. Zones with the widest chromosomal clines had the widest mitochondrial DNA clines. It appears that, even within a single species, the extent of karyotypic differentiation between pairs of races is not a good predictor of the level of disadvantage suffered by hybrids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12778554     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Reproductive isolation between phylogeographic lineages scales with divergence.

Authors:  Sonal Singhal; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Highly variable reproductive isolation among pairs of Catostomus species.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mandeville; Thomas L Parchman; David B McDonald; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Genomic and phenotypic consequences of two independent secondary contact zones between allopatric lineages of the anadromous ice goby Leucopsarion petersii.

Authors:  Shotaro Hirase; Tomoyuki Kokita; Atsushi J Nagano; Kiyoshi Kikuchi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Little and large: body size and genetic clines in a New Zealand gecko (Woodworthia maculata) along a coastal transect.

Authors:  Josephine Fitness; Rodney A Hitchmough; Mary Morgan-Richards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Phylogeography of Saproxylic and Forest Floor Invertebrates from Tallaganda, South-eastern Australia.

Authors:  Ryan C Garrick; David M Rowell; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Positive selection and comparative molecular evolution of reproductive proteins from New Zealand tree weta (Orthoptera, Hemideina).

Authors:  Victoria G Twort; Alice B Dennis; Duckchul Park; Kathryn F Lomas; Richard D Newcomb; Thomas R Buckley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patterns of introgression vary within an avian hybrid zone.

Authors:  Logan M Maxwell; Jennifer Walsh; Brian J Olsen; Adrienne I Kovach
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-28

8.  Little or no gene flow despite F1 hybrids at two interspecific contact zones.

Authors:  Natasha E Mckean; Steven A Trewick; Mary Morgan-Richards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.