Literature DB >> 12776887

Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats.

Kate E Jones1, Andy Purvis, John L Gittleman.   

Abstract

We investigated patterns and processes of extinction and threat in bats using a multivariate phylogenetic comparative approach. Of nearly 1,000 species worldwide, 239 are considered threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and 12 are extinct. Small geographic ranges and low wing aspect ratios are independently found to predict extinction risk in bats, which explains 48% of the total variance in IUCN assessments of threat. The pattern and correlates of extinction risk in the two bat suborders are significantly different. A higher proportion (4%) of megachiropteran species have gone extinct in the last 500 years than microchiropteran bats (0.3%), and a higher proportion is currently at risk of extinction (Megachiroptera: 34%; Microchiroptera: 22%). While correlates of microchiropteran extinction risk are the same as in the order as a whole, megachiropteran extinction is correlated more with reproductive rate and less with wing morphology. Bat extinction risk is not randomly distributed phylogenetically: closely related species have more similar levels of threat than would be expected if extinction risk were random. Given the unbalanced nature of the evolutionary diversification of bats, it is probable that the amount of phylogenetic diversity lost if currently threatened taxa disappear may be greater than in other clades with numerically more threatened species.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12776887     DOI: 10.1086/368289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  49 in total

1.  How species respond to multiple extinction threats.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  High dispersal ability inhibits speciation in a continental radiation of passerine birds.

Authors:  Santiago Claramunt; Elizabeth P Derryberry; J V Remsen; Robb T Brumfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Hunting to extinction: biology and regional economy influence extinction risk and the impact of hunting in artiodactyls.

Authors:  Samantha A Price; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction.

Authors:  Jonathan L Payne; Seth Finnegan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Darwin's bridge between microevolution and macroevolution.

Authors:  David N Reznick; Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  High variability in patterns of population decline: the importance of local processes in species extinctions.

Authors:  Guy Cowlishaw; Richard A Pettifor; Nick J B Isaac
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A framework for developing management goals for species at risk with examples from military installations in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca Efroymson; Henriette Jager; Virginia Dale; James Westervelt
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Adding fossil occupancy trajectories to the assessment of modern extinction risk.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kiessling; Ádám T Kocsis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo; Georgina M Mace; John L Gittleman; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.