Literature DB >> 19830479

A framework for developing management goals for species at risk with examples from military installations in the United States.

Rebecca Efroymson1, Henriette Jager, Virginia Dale, James Westervelt.   

Abstract

A decision framework for setting management goals for species at risk is presented. Species at risk are those whose potential future rarity is of concern. Listing these species as threatened or endangered could potentially result in significant restrictions to activities in resource management areas in order to maintain those species. The decision framework, designed to foster proactive management, has nine steps: identify species at risk on and near the management area, describe available information and potential information gaps for each species, determine the potential distribution of species and their habitat, select metrics for describing species status, assess the status of local population or metapopulation, conduct threat assessment, set and prioritize management goals, develop species management plans, and develop criteria for ending special species management where possible. This framework will aid resource managers in setting management goals that minimally impact human activities while reducing the likelihood that species at risk will become rare in the near future. The management areas in many of the examples are United States (US) military installations, which are concerned about potential restrictions to military training capacity if species at risk become regulated under the US Endangered Species Act. The benefits of the proactive management set forth in this formal decision framework are that it is impartial, provides a clear procedure, calls for identification of causal relationships that may not be obvious, provides a way to target the most urgent needs, reduces costs, enhances public confidence, and, most importantly, decreases the chance of species becoming more rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19830479     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9385-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  14 in total

1.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?

Authors:  S J Andelman; W F Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Glenn W Suter; Susan B Norton; Susan M Cormier
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

4.  A comprehensive approach to identifying monitoring priorities of small landbirds on military installations.

Authors:  Donald P Althoff; James W Rivers; Jeffrey S Pontius; Philip S Gipson; Philip B Woodford
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Predicted effects of prescribed burning and harvesting on forest recovery and sustainability in southwest Georgia, USA.

Authors:  Charles T Garten
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.

Authors:  Liana N Joseph; Richard F Maloney; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Assessing Land-Use Impacts on Natural Resources

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  The effect of military training activity on eastern lupine and the Karner blue butterfly at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, USA.

Authors:  Mark A Smith; Monica G Turner; Donald H Rusch
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Importance of habitat quality and landscape connectivity for the persistence of endangered natterjack toads.

Authors:  Virginie M Stevens; Michel Baguette
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Determining the causes of impairments in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: part 2. Characterization of causes.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Susan B Norton; Glenn W Suter; David Altfater; Bernie Counts
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  3 in total

1.  Landscape influences on headwater streams on Fort Stewart, Georgia, USA.

Authors:  Henriette I Jager; Mark S Bevelhimer; Roy L King; Katy A Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A strategy for prioritizing threats and recovery actions for at-risk species.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Philip J Murphy; Nathan W Strout; Steven P Campbell; Kimberleigh J Field; Linda Allison; Roy C Averill-Murray
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Geographic distribution of isolated indigenous societies in Amazonia and the efficacy of indigenous territories.

Authors:  Dylan C Kesler; Robert S Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.