Literature DB >> 12774042

An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries.

Isabelle Hirtzlin1, Christine Dubreuil, Nathalie Préaubert, Jenny Duchier, Brigitte Jansen, Jürgen Simon, Paula Lobato De Faria, Anna Perez-Lezaun, Bert Visser, Garrath D Williams, Anne Cambon-Thomsen.   

Abstract

Biobanks correspond to different situations: research and technological development, medical diagnosis or therapeutic activities. Their status is not clearly defined. We aimed to investigate human biobanking in Europe, particularly in relation to organisational, economic and ethical issues in various national contexts. Data from a survey in six EU countries (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK) were collected as part of a European Research Project examining human and non-human biobanking (EUROGENBANK, coordinated by Professor JC Galloux). A total of 147 institutions concerned with biobanking of human samples and data were investigated by questionnaires and interviews. Most institutions surveyed belong to the public or private non-profit-making sectors, which have a key role in biobanking. This activity is increasing in all countries because few samples are discarded and genetic research is proliferating. Collections vary in size, many being small and only a few very large. Their purpose is often research, or research and healthcare, mostly in the context of disease studies. A specific budget is very rarely allocated to biobanking and costs are not often evaluated. Samples are usually provided free of charge and gifts and exchanges are the common rule. Good practice guidelines are generally followed and quality controls are performed but quality procedures are not always clearly explained. Associated data are usually computerised (identified or identifiable samples). Biobankers generally favour centralisation of data rather than of samples. Legal and ethical harmonisation within Europe is considered likely to facilitate international collaboration. We propose a series of recommendations and suggestions arising from the EUROGENBANK project.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12774042     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  28 in total

1.  Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Georg Lauss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Genotyping of DNA samples isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues using preamplification.

Authors:  Renee Baak-Pablo; Vincent Dezentje; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Tahar van der Straaten
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  The informed consent aftermath of the genetic revolution. An Italian example of implementation.

Authors:  Federica Artizzu
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-07-19

4.  Linkage of data from diverse data sources (LDS): a data combination model provides clinical data of corresponding specimens in biobanking information system.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Enver Özgür; Axel Semjonow; Jan Herden; Ilgar Akbarov; Ali Tok; Udo Engelmann; Sebastian Wille
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  [Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). Implications for pathology].

Authors:  C Viertler; K Zatloukal
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Elena Salvaterra; Lucilla Lecchi; Silvia Giovanelli; Barbara Butti; Maria Teresa Bardella; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Silvano Bosari; Guido Coggi; Domenico A Coviello; Faustina Lalatta; Maurizio Moggio; Mario Nosotti; Alberto Zanella; Paolo Rebulla
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  A critical analysis of cancer biobank practices in relation to biospecimen quality.

Authors:  Amanda Rush; Kevin Spring; Jennifer A Byrne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2015-10-22

8.  Maintaining Breast Cancer Specimen Integrity and Individual or Simultaneous Extraction of Quality DNA, RNA, and Proteins from Allprotect-Stabilized and Nonstabilized Tissue Samples.

Authors:  Blanaid C Mee; Paul Carroll; Simona Donatello; Elizabeth Connolly; Mairead Griffin; Barbara Dunne; Louise Burke; Richard Flavin; Hala Rizkalla; Ciara Ryan; Brian Hayes; Charles D'Adhemar; Niamh Banville; Nazia Faheem; Cian Muldoon; Eoin F Gaffney
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Assessing the utility of whole-genome amplified serum DNA for array-based high throughput genotyping.

Authors:  Kristine L Bucasas; Gagan A Pandya; Sonal Pradhan; Robert D Fleischmann; Scott N Peterson; John W Belmont
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Attitudes towards transfers of human tissue samples across borders: an international survey of researchers and policy makers in five countries.

Authors:  Xinqing Zhang; Kenji Matsui; Benjamin Krohmal; Alaa Abou Zeid; Vasantha Muthuswamy; Young Mo Koo; Yoshikuni Kita; Reidar K Lie
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.