T Lawrence1, P Aveyard, O Evans, K K Cheng. 1. The Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. p.t.lawrence@bham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness in helping pregnant women stop smoking of two interventions (Pro-Change for a healthy pregnancy) based on the transtheoretical model of behaviour change (TTM) compared to current standard care. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING:Antenatal clinics in West Midlands, UK general practices. PARTICIPANTS: 918 pregnant smokers INTERVENTIONS: 100 general practices were randomised into the three trial arms. Midwives in these practices delivered three interventions: A (standard care), B (TTM based self help manuals), and C (TTM based self help manuals plus sessions with an interactive computer program giving individualised smoking cessation advice). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biochemically confirmed smoking cessation for 10 weeks previously, and point prevalence abstinence, both measured at 30 weeks of pregnancy and 10 days after delivery. RESULTS: There were small differences between the TTM arms. Combining the two arms, the odds ratios at 30 weeks were 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 4.85) for 10 week sustained abstinence and 2.92 (95% CI 1.42 to 6.03) for point prevalence abstinence relative to controls. At 10 days after delivery, the odds ratios were 2.81 (95% CI 1.11 to 7.13) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.00 to 3.41) for 10 week and point prevalence abstinence respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a small borderline significant increase in quitting in the combined intervention arms compared with the controls, the effect of the intervention is small. At 30 weeks gestation and at 10 days postnatal, only about 3% of the intervention groups achieved sustained cessation, with numbers needed to treat of 67 (30 weeks of gestation) and 53 (10 weeks postnatal) for one additional woman to achieve sustained confirmed cessation. Given also that the intervention was resource intensive, it is of doubtful benefit.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness in helping pregnant women stop smoking of two interventions (Pro-Change for a healthy pregnancy) based on the transtheoretical model of behaviour change (TTM) compared to current standard care. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Antenatal clinics in West Midlands, UK general practices. PARTICIPANTS: 918 pregnant smokers INTERVENTIONS: 100 general practices were randomised into the three trial arms. Midwives in these practices delivered three interventions: A (standard care), B (TTM based self help manuals), and C (TTM based self help manuals plus sessions with an interactive computer program giving individualised smoking cessation advice). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biochemically confirmed smoking cessation for 10 weeks previously, and point prevalence abstinence, both measured at 30 weeks of pregnancy and 10 days after delivery. RESULTS: There were small differences between the TTM arms. Combining the two arms, the odds ratios at 30 weeks were 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 4.85) for 10 week sustained abstinence and 2.92 (95% CI 1.42 to 6.03) for point prevalence abstinence relative to controls. At 10 days after delivery, the odds ratios were 2.81 (95% CI 1.11 to 7.13) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.00 to 3.41) for 10 week and point prevalence abstinence respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a small borderline significant increase in quitting in the combined intervention arms compared with the controls, the effect of the intervention is small. At 30 weeks gestation and at 10 days postnatal, only about 3% of the intervention groups achieved sustained cessation, with numbers needed to treat of 67 (30 weeks of gestation) and 53 (10 weeks postnatal) for one additional woman to achieve sustained confirmed cessation. Given also that the intervention was resource intensive, it is of doubtful benefit.
Authors: J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; J L Fava; L Ruggiero; R G Laforge; J S Rossi; S S Johnson; P A Lee Journal: Prev Med Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Xinyu Tang; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves; Stephen W Erickson; Stewart L MacLeod; Sadia Malik Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2015-06-02
Authors: Andriani N Loukopoulou; Constantine I Vardavas; George Farmakides; Christos Rossolymos; Charalambos Chrelias; Manolis N Tzatzarakis; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Maria Lymberi; Gregory N Connolly; Panagiotis K Behrakis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine Chamberlain; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Sandy Oliver; Jenny R Caird; Susan M Perlen; Sandra J Eades; James Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Kathy S Katz; Susan M Blake; Renee A Milligan; Phyllis W Sharps; Davene B White; Margaret F Rodan; Maryann Rossi; Kennan B Murray Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 3.007