Literature DB >> 11456079

Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation.

J O Prochaska1, W F Velicer, J L Fava, J S Rossi, J Y Tsoh.   

Abstract

A stage-matched expert system intervention was evaluated on 4144 smokers in a two-arm randomized control trial with four follow-ups over 24 months. Smokers were recruited by random digit-dial calls, and 80.0% of the eligible smokers were enrolled. Individualized and interactive expert system computer reports were sent at 0, 3, and 6 months. The reports provided feedback on 15 variables relevant for progressing through the stages. The primary outcomes were point prevalence and prolonged abstinence rates. At 24 months, the expert system resulted in 25.6% point prevalence and 12% prolonged abstinence, which were 30% and 56% greater than the control condition. Abstinence rates at each 6-month follow-up were significantly greater in the Expert System (ES) condition than in the comparison condition with the absolute difference increasing at each follow-up. A proactive home-based stage-matched expert system smoking cessation program can produce both high participation rates and relatively high abstinence rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11456079     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  73 in total

1.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward Lichtenstein; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Integrating population smoking cessation policies and programs.

Authors:  James O Prochaska; Wayne F Velicer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Automated e-mail messaging as a tool for improving quit rates in an internet smoking cessation intervention.

Authors:  Leslie Lenert; Ricardo F Muñoz; John E Perez; Aditya Bansod
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Smoking and the Five-Factor Model of personality.

Authors:  Antonio Terracciano; Paul T Costa
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Karen L Bierman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2004-09

6.  Questions about quitting (Q2): design and methods of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) randomized screening experiment for an online, motivational smoking cessation intervention.

Authors:  J B McClure; H Derry; K R Riggs; E W Westbrook; J St John; S M Shortreed; A Bogart; L C An
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Motivating the unmotivated for health behavior change: a randomized trial of cessation induction for smokers.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Anthony J Alberg; Kevin M Gray; Michael E Saladin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme.

Authors:  L H G Swartz; J W Noell; S W Schroeder; D V Ary
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The association between occupational exposures and cigarette smoking among operating engineers.

Authors:  OiSaeng Hong; Sonia A Duffy; Seung Hee Choi; Dal Lae Chin
Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.663

10.  Predictors of relapse among smokers: transtheoretical effort variables, demographics, and smoking severity.

Authors:  N S Gökbayrak; A L Paiva; B J Blissmer; J O Prochaska
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.