Literature DB >> 12773649

Regionalization and the underuse of angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as compared with a fee-for-service system.

Laura A Petersen1, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Lucian L Leape, Barbara J McNeil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Policies to concentrate or regionalize invasive procedures at high-volume medical centers are under active consideration. Such policies could improve outcomes among those who undergo procedures while increasing their underuse among those who never reach such centers. We compared the underuse of needed angiography after acute myocardial infarction in a traditional Medicare fee-for-service system with underuse in the regionalized Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system.
METHODS: We studied 1665 veterans from 81 VA hospitals and 19,305 Medicare patients from 1530 non-VA hospitals, all of whom were elderly men. We compared adjusted angiography use and one-year mortality among patients for whom angiography was rated as clinically needed. We compared underuse in models before and after controlling for the on-site availability of cardiac procedures.
RESULTS: After adjustment for the need for angiography, underuse was present in both groups, but VA patients remained significantly less likely than Medicare patients to undergo angiography (43.9 percent vs. 51.0 percent; odds ratio, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.96). After also controlling for on-site availability of cardiac procedures at the admitting hospital, we found no significant difference in the underuse of angiography among VA patients as compared with Medicare patients (odds ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.26) or in one-year mortality (odds ratio, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.28).
CONCLUSIONS: There is underuse of needed angiography after acute myocardial infarction in both the VA and Medicare systems, but the rate of underuse is significantly higher in the VA. These differences appear to be associated with limited on-site availability of cardiac procedures in the regionalized VA health care system. Further work should focus on how regionalization policies could be improved with effective referral and triage processes. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773649     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa021725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of the VA Health Care System.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story?

Authors:  Adam Oliver
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Designing a model health care system.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Strategies from a nationwide health information technology implementation: the VA CART story.

Authors:  Tamára L Box; Mary McDonell; Christian D Helfrich; Robert L Jesse; Stephan D Fihn; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Veterans' Reliance on VA Care by Type of Service and Distance to VA for Nonelderly VA-Medicaid Dual Enrollees.

Authors:  Jean Yoon; Megan E Vanneman; Sharon K Dally; Amal N Trivedi; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Survival of older patients with cancer in the Veterans Health Administration versus fee-for-service Medicare.

Authors:  Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Steven H Krasnow; Lawrence Shulman; Jennifer R Brown; Craig C Earle; Michael Rabin; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers' Cardiology Services.

Authors:  Lowell Chang; Wade Brown; Jason Carr; Charles Lui; Kimberly Selzman; Caroline Milne; John Nord; Paul Eleazer
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2019-11

8.  Long-term outcomes of regional variations in intensity of invasive vs medical management of Medicare Patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; David E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Canadian quality indicators for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Xiaofu Zhu; Janice Richards; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Impact of regionalisation of cardiac surgery in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Authors:  L Nobilio; D Fortuna; M Vizioli; E Berti; P Guastaroba; F Taroni; R Grilli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.