Literature DB >> 12771831

Femoral component design and patellar clunk syndrome.

William J Maloney1, Robert Schmidt, Thomas P Sculco.   

Abstract

The effect of patellar design of the femoral component on the prevalence of patellar clunk was examined by comparing 179 consecutive Insall-Burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee replacements with 210 consecutive primary Advanced posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. In the Advanced posterior-stabilized knee replacements, the patellofemoral groove had been extended posteriorly 7.5 mm compared with the Insall-Burstein II implant. At a minimum followup of 2 years, the prevalence of patellar clunk syndrome in the patients with a Insall-Burstein II knee replacement was 3.9% (seven of 179) compared with 0% in the patients with an Advanced posterior-stabilized knee replacement. Based on these data, it seems that the design change in patellofemoral groove of the Advanced posterior-stabilized knee replacement has eliminated the problem of patellar clunks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771831     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063606.67412.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

Review 1.  Causes of failure and etiology of painful primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Romain Seil; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Scorpio single radius total knee arthroplasty. A minimal five-year follow-up multicentric study.

Authors:  Frédéric Borrione; Paul Bonnevialle; Christian Mabit; Olivier Guingand; Denis Bertin; François Bonnomet; Christophe Denis; Gilles Gagna
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Patellar clunk in total knee arthroplasty using modified Sigma posterior stabilized femoral component.

Authors:  K T Rajshekhar; M N Kumar; P Venugopal; Thomas Chandy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-08-27

4.  Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses.

Authors:  Won Chul Choi; Keun-Jung Ryu; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Jong Hun Baek; Kyung Tack Yoon; Hyuck Sung Son; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Is further treatment necessary for patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bo-Hyun Hwang; Chang-Hyun Nam; Kwang-Am Jung; Alvin Ong; Su-Chan Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems.

Authors:  Raffaele Mugnai; Vitantonio Digennaro; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Patellofemoral crepitus after total knee arthroplasty: etiology and preventive measures.

Authors:  David N Conrad; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02-14

Review 9.  Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Ingo Volker Rembitzki; Gerd-Peter Brüggemann; Andree Ellermann; Raymond Best; Andreas Gösele- Koppenburg; Christian Liebau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  PAIN FOLLOWING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH.

Authors:  Wilson Mello Alves; Eduardo Zaniol Migon; Jose Luis Amim Zabeu
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.