Literature DB >> 12771770

Regret in men treated for localized prostate cancer.

Jim C Hu1, Lorna Kwan, Christopher S Saigal, Mark S Litwin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We identify the predictors of medical regret in men treated for localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients previously treated for early stage prostate cancer were assessed for treatment regret using validated items. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified associations between regret and demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, medical knowledge, and general and disease specific health related quality of life as measured by the general health perceptions domain of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and a validated short form of the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index.
RESULTS: Of 96 respondents (mean age 64 years, mean followup 2.8 years) 16% expressed regret with treatment decisions. Regretful men were almost twice as likely as nonregretful men to have less than a college education (60% versus 33%, p = 0.05) and worse current health related quality of life (p <0.05). In addition, regretful men tended to be unable to recall the most recent prostate specific antigen accurately (p = 0.06). Men with and without regret did not differ in other demographic characteristics, treatment choice or clinical outcomes. Regretful men were more likely to say they would choose a different treatment if they could. In multivariate analyses worse quality of life predicted regret but decline in quality of life with time was not associated with regret.
CONCLUSIONS: Men expressing regret over treatment choice for localized prostate cancer have poorer health related quality of life. Further study is needed to identify factors that predict posttreatment regret. Such information will allow patients and physicians to individualize treatment decisions, optimize quality of life and avoid medical regret.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771770     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000065662.52170.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The Development of an eHealth tool suite for prostate cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Donna Van Bogaert; Robert Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; David Jarrard
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15

Review 3.  The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Emma Turner; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prospective comparison of the impact of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and decision regret.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Andrew Matthew; Abbie M Gardner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Local Therapy Decisional Regret in Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Pragati G Advani; Xiudong Lei; Cameron W Swanick; Ying Xu; Yu Shen; Nathan A Goodwin; Grace L Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Kelly K Hunt; Reshma Jagsi; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The association between race and treatment regret among men with recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  B A Mahal; M-H Chen; C L Bennett; M W Kattan; O Sartor; K Stein; A V D'Amico; P L Nguyen
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Reduced penile size and treatment regret in men with recurrent prostate cancer after surgery, radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation, or radiotherapy alone.

Authors:  Arti Parekh; Ming-Hui Chen; Karen E Hoffman; Toni K Choueiri; Jim C Hu; Charles L Bennett; Michael W Kattan; Oliver Sartor; Karen Stein; Powell L Graham; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Wilson; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  [Therapy choices of German urologists and radio-oncologists if personally diagnosed with localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Gillitzer; C Hampel; C Thomas; F Schmidt; S W Melchior; S Pahernik; H Schmidberger; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  "It's not like I can change my mind later": reversibility and decision timing in prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; William J Ellis; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.