Literature DB >> 12769137

Cognitive approaches to summary measurement: its application to the measurement of diversity in health-related quality of life assessments.

Ivan Barofsky1.   

Abstract

This paper describes elements of a cognitive approach to summary measurement, as it is applied to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment. A summary measure, by its very nature, represents, but does not reproduce, some body of information. As a consequence, how a summary measure is formulated becomes a critical determinant of its usefulness. In most cases, formal (arithmetic or investigator-based) methods are used. However, it was also noted that a person ordinarily summarizes the information they receive. Qualitative analytic techniques (e.g., cognitive interviewing methods) can provide insight into the cognitive processes underlying such summary formation. These cognitive processes, formulated as algorithms, would also be expected to vary as a function of different groups of respondents and settings. Finding a common denominator, a common algorithm, would provide a consensus summary measure amongst diverse groups whose HRQOL is being assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12769137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  9 in total

Review 1.  Aging, culture, and cognition.

Authors:  D C Park; R Nisbett; T Hedden
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases.

Authors:  K Fiedler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

Authors:  R E Nisbett; K Peng; I Choi; A Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The role of cognitive equivalence in studies of health-related quality-of-life assessments.

Authors:  I Barofsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States.

Authors:  A L Stewart; A Nápoles-Springer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.

Authors:  B H Ross; G L Murphy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  What do global self-rated health items measure?

Authors:  N M Krause; G M Jay
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.983

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Metacognition: towards a new approach to quality of life.

Authors:  Julien Blanc; Laurent Boyer; Pierre Le Coz; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clarifying quality of life assessment: do theoretical models capture the underlying cognitive processes?

Authors:  Elsbeth F Bloem; Florence J van Zuuren; Margot A Koeneman; Bruce D Rapkin; Mechteld R M Visser; Caro C E Koning; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.