Literature DB >> 12768267

Enhanced attention in rhesus monkeys as a common factor for the cognitive effects of drugs with abuse potential.

John N Bain1, Mark A Prendergast, Alvin V Terry, Stephen P Arneric, Mark A Smith, Jerry J Buccafusco.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: One of the common neurochemical features of many drugs of abuse is their ability to directly or indirectly enhance dopaminergic activity in the brain, particularly within the ventral tegmental-nucleus accumbens pathway. Dopaminergic pathways in the frontal and limbic cortex also may be targets for these agents, where pharmacological effects could result in heightened attention and/or support self-administration behavior.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether drugs from differing pharmacological classes that exhibit abuse potential would share the ability to counter distractability in the delayed matching task.
METHODS: Well trained mature macaques performed a computer-assisted delayed matching-to-sample task which included trials associated with three delay intervals and randomly interspersed task-relevant distractors. Drug regimens included four to five doses and subjects were tested no more than twice per week.
RESULTS: All but one of the six compounds (tomoxetine), on average, increased task accuracy for either non-distractor or distractor trials. It was evident that for several compounds, doses required to improve accuracy for non-distractor trials were routinely greater than the doses required to improve accuracy for distractor trials. Data for the individualized Best dose (based upon the subject's optimal level of accuracy during distractor trials) revealed statistically significant distractor-related improvements in task accuracy for the same five compounds. The relative efficacy for reversing distractor-induced decrements in task accuracy was estimated by the level of improvement with respect to baseline: nomifensine (31%)>nicotine (22%) approximately morphine (19%) approximately caffeine (19%) approximately methylphenidate (22%) >tomoxetine (9%). Tomoxetine (noradrenergic preferring) was the only compound that did not produce a significant improvement in accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide pharmacological support for the concept that attentional mechanisms may play an important role in the "environmental" associative aspects of drug seeking behavior, and as such they may provide the basis for treatment strategies aimed at preventing relapse in detoxified addicts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12768267     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1483-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  38 in total

Review 1.  Attention as a target of intoxication: insights and methods from studies of drug abuse.

Authors:  P J Bushnell; E D Levin; R T Marrocco; M F Sarter; B J Strupp; D M Warburton
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 2.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Blockade by reserpine of methylphenidate-induced release of brain dopamine.

Authors:  C C Chiueh; K E Moore
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Effectiveness and tolerability of tomoxetine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  T Spencer; J Biederman; T Wilens; J Prince; M Hatch; J Jones; M Harding; S V Faraone; L Seidman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Effects of nomifensine in vitro on uptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine and dopamine into human platelets.

Authors:  R S Ehsanullah; P Turner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Regional rat brain levels of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid: concurrent fluorometric measurement and influence of drugs.

Authors:  B H Westerink; J Korf
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Central nicotinic receptor agonists ABT-418, ABT-089, and (-)-nicotine reduce distractibility in adult monkeys.

Authors:  M A Prendergast; W J Jackson; A V Terry; M W Decker; S P Arneric; J J Buccafusco
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Pharmacodynamics of nomifensine: a review of studies in healthy subjects.

Authors:  K Siegfried; K Taeuber
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Qualitative differences in the discriminative stimulus effects of low and high doses of caffeine in the rat.

Authors:  G K Mumford; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Dopamine uptake is differentially regulated in rat striatum and nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  C Missale; L Castelletti; S Govoni; P F Spano; M Trabucchi; I Hanbauer
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.372

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effects of nicotine and non-nicotine smoking factors on working memory and associated brain function.

Authors:  Francis Joseph McClernon; Brett Froeliger; Jed E Rose; Rachel V Kozink; Merideth A Addicott; Maggie M Sweitzer; Eric C Westman; Dana M Van Wert
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Effects of environmental and pharmacological manipulations on a novel delayed nonmatching-to-sample 'working memory' procedure in unrestrained rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Distributive justice and cognitive enhancement in lower, normal intelligence.

Authors:  Mikael Dunlop; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

4.  Atomoxetine improves memory and other components of executive function in young-adult rats and aged rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Patrick M Callahan; Marc R Plagenhoef; David T Blake; Alvin V Terry
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Remifentanil maintains lower initial delayed nonmatching-to-sample accuracy compared to food pellets in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Combined effects of THC and caffeine on working memory in rats.

Authors:  Leigh V Panlilio; Sergi Ferré; Sevil Yasar; Eric B Thorndike; Charles W Schindler; Steven R Goldberg
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Cognitive enhancers for the treatment of ADHD.

Authors:  L Cinnamon Bidwell; F Joseph McClernon; Scott H Kollins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Neuronal effects of nicotine during auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Jason Smucny; Ann Olincy; Lindsay S Eichman; Jason R Tregellas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A critical examination of best dose analysis for determining cognitive-enhancing potential of drugs: studies with rhesus monkeys and computer simulations.

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Jesse Dallery; Nancy A Ator; Brian R Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The scopolamine-reversal paradigm in rats and monkeys: the importance of computer-assisted operant-conditioning memory tasks for screening drug candidates.

Authors:  Jerry J Buccafusco; Alvin V Terry; Scott J Webster; Daniel Martin; Elizabeth J Hohnadel; Kristy A Bouchard; Samantha E Warner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.