Literature DB >> 12767753

UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol?

Virginia Barbour1.   

Abstract

Before it has even begun recruiting participants, the UK Biobank project has raised extraordinary passions among scientists. Some scientists are broadly supportive of the project, and feel that it is a scientifically valid, potentially valuable resource, although they still have reservations over the details of the current protocol. Others see it as an ill-conceived, politically motivated project, in which consultations have only been done to give an appearance of legitimacy and in which the scientific case has not been made for its design. There has been resentment over how the protocol has evolved, and the secrecy and legal constraints that surrounded the process for groups bidding to be involved has had the appearance of attempting to stifle debate. For this article even supporters of the project have been unwilling to be quoted on the record. The only point that everyone seems to agree on is that sufficient debate about the project has not taken place.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12767753     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13377-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  21 in total

1.  Conference report--highlights of the 4th EMBO/EMBL joint conference on genetics, determinism and human freedom, November 14-15, 2003; Heidelberg, Germany.

Authors:  Elena Armandola
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-02-09

Review 2.  Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?

Authors:  Jane L Halliday; Veronica R Collins; Mary Anne Aitken; Martin P M Richards; Craig A Olsson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Genes on ice.

Authors:  Geoff Watts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-31

6.  Universal risk factors for multifactorial diseases: LifeLines: a three-generation population-based study.

Authors:  Ronald P Stolk; Judith G M Rosmalen; Dirkje S Postma; Rudolf A de Boer; Gerjan Navis; Joris P J Slaets; Johan Ormel; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  The Measurement to Understand Reclassification of Disease of Cabarrus/Kannapolis (MURDOCK) Study Community Registry and Biorepository.

Authors:  Sayanti Bhattacharya; Ashley A Dunham; Melissa A Cornish; Victoria A Christian; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Meredith L Nahm; Marie Lynn Miranda; Robert M Califf; Rowena J Dolor; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Counterpoint: "streamlined" does not mean simple.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Rory Collins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participants' privacy.

Authors:  Grigorios Loukides; Joshua C Denny; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The Socio-Exposome: Advancing Exposure Science and Environmental Justice in a Post-Genomic Era.

Authors:  Laura Senier; Phil Brown; Sara Shostak; Bridget Hanna
Journal:  Environ Sociol       Date:  2016-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.