Literature DB >> 12764711

Do psychiatrists understand research-related experiences, attitudes, and motivations of schizophrenia study participants?

Teddy D Warner1, Laura Weiss Roberts, Khanh Nguyen.   

Abstract

Psychiatrists serve in different but important capacities with research participants. Because ethical problems may arise in research when participants misunderstand motives and responsibilities of clinical-investigators (i.e., "therapeutic misconception"), it is important that relationships between research participants and psychiatric caregivers and investigators be based on genuine mutual understanding. Considerations about attunement of psychiatrists with schizophrenia research participants have never been studied empirically. As part of a larger structured interview-survey study, we assessed the predictions of psychiatrists regarding self-reported experiences, attitudes, and motivations of individual schizophrenia research volunteers who were known to the respondent psychiatrists. Fourteen patient-psychiatrist pairs were identified for inclusion. Psychiatrists predicted schizophrenia research participants' ease of participation, privacy concerns, and willingness to participate in future research but underestimated their positive overall experience. Psychiatrists also were attuned to schizophrenia participants' attitudes and motivations regarding personal benefit but did not accurately predict their responses concerning helping others and science. Also, psychiatrists underestimated the schizophrenia participants' perceived degree of influence by researchers and caregivers during recruitment. Psychiatrists recognized the burden, primary concerns, future participation willingness, and personal benefit orientation of schizophrenia participants, but they did not appear to fully understand the overall positive quality of research experience, altruistic orientation, and relationship orientation of their schizophrenia patients who volunteer for research participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12764711     DOI: 10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00042-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  10 in total

1.  A time of promise, a time of promises: ethical issues in advancing psychopharmacological research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; John Krystal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Inclusion of patients with severe mental illness in clinical trials: issues and recommendations surrounding informed consent.

Authors:  Sander P K Welie; Ron L P Berghmans
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  A description of the process of recruitment for research studies investigating the genetics of psychotic illness.

Authors:  Kimberly K Mathos; Raquel E Gur; Fran Lokar; Monica E Calkins; Vishwajit Nimgaonkar
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Robert S Olick
Journal:  Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-12

6.  Views of people with schizophrenia regarding aspects of research: study size and funding sources.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine Green Hammond; Jinger G Hoop
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.

Authors:  Ingo Schäfer; Tom Burns; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Silvana Galderisi; Janusz K Rybakowski; Jan Libiger; Wulf Rössler; Andrew Molodynski; Monika Edlinger; Giuseppe Piegari; Jela Hrnčiarova; Krystyna Gorna; Matthias Jaeger; Anne-Kathrin Fett; Johanna Hissbach; Dieter Naber
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Do research procedures pose relatively greater risk for healthy persons than for persons with schizophrenia?

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Katherine A Green Hammond; Teddy D Warner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Factors Influencing Perceived Helpfulness and Participation in Innovative Research: A Pilot Study of Individuals with and without Mood Symptoms.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Tenzin Tsungmey; Maryam Rostami; Sangeeta Mondal; Max Kasun; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2021-09-22

10.  Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Motivators for Research Participation Among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated.

Authors:  Bridget L Hanson; Sherilyn A Faulkner; Christiane Brems; Staci L Corey; Gloria D Eldridge; Mark E Johnson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.