Literature DB >> 12764406

Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension.

S G Chrysant1, T C Marbury, T D Robinson.   

Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil has been shown to compare favourably with that of other antihypertensive agents. This randomized, double-blind study compared the antihypertensive efficacy of the starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil with that of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate (amlodipine) in subjects with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 440 subjects aged >/=18 years were randomized to the starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil (20 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or placebo for 8 weeks. Subjects were evaluated by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and by seated cuff blood pressure (BP) measurements at trough. The primary end point was the change from baseline in mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by ABPM at Week 8. Secondary end points included change from baseline in mean 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 8 weeks, change from baseline in mean seated trough cuff DBP and SBP measurements, and response and control rates for DBP <90 and <85 mmHg. Control rates for SBP <140 and <130 mmHg were also calculated. Olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine produced significantly greater reductions in ambulatory and seated DBP and SBP compared with placebo. Mean reductions in ambulatory and seated BP were similar between the two active agents; however, in the olmesartan medoxomil group, significantly more patients achieved the SBP goal of <130 mmHg and the DBP goal of <85 mmHg. Both drugs were well tolerated at the recommended starting dose. Although amlodipine was associated with a higher incidence of oedema, this did not reach statistical significance. Olmesartan medoxomil is an effective antihypertensive agent, with BP-lowering efficacy at the starting dose similar to that of amlodipine, and is associated with more patients achieving the rigorous BP goals of SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12764406     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  15 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Kazutaka Yoshihara; Yuying Gao; Hiroshi Shiga; D Russell Wada; Masafumi Hisaoka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Stefano Taddei; Merete Holm-Bentzen; Jacek Baszak; Lorenzo Melani; Kai Schumacher
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Relationship between the frequency of blood pressure self-measurement and blood pressure reduction with antihypertensive therapy : results of the OLMETEL (OLMEsartan TELemonitoring blood pressure) study.

Authors:  Silke Ewald; Johannes vor dem Esche; Sakir Uen; Fabian Neikes; Hans Vetter; Thomas Mengden
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Reinhold Kreutz; Juliane Bolbrinker; Matthias Huber
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Olmesartan ameliorates myocardial function independent of blood pressure control in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Rie Futai; Takahide Ito; Yasunori Kawanishi; Fumio Terasaki; Yasushi Kitaura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparative effectiveness of an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, in older hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Josep Redon; Michael A Weber; Paul-Egbert Reimitz; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Long-term efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil in Chinese hypertensive patients as assessed by clinic, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Ning-Ling Sun; Yuan-Nan Ke; Bo-Heng Zhang; Naotaka Ikegami; Jun-Ren Zhu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Proactive compared with passive adverse event recognition: calcium channel blocker-associated edema.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.