Literature DB >> 12764386

Bone marrow stromal-derived soluble factors and direct cell contact contribute to de novo drug resistance of myeloma cells by distinct mechanisms.

Y Nefedova1, T H Landowski, W S Dalton.   

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment plays a critical role in determining the fate of tumor cells. We have previously reported that adhesion of human myeloma and leukemia cell lines to the extracellular matrix protein, fibronectin, confers a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Mechanisms associated with this cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance are drug-type specific. In the present study, we examined the influence of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) on myeloma cell response to the topoisomerase II inhibitor, mitoxantrone. Apoptosis was inhibited by more than 50% when cells were adhered to BMSCs as compared to myeloma cells maintained in suspension. To investigate the mechanisms contributing to the resistance of myeloma cells in contact with BMSCs, we examined the protective effects of BMSCs under four separate conditions: (1) direct cell contact; (2) BMSCs conditioned medium; (3) medium conditioned by coculturing myeloma cells in direct contact with BMSCs; and (4) medium conditioned by coculturing myeloma cells and BMSCs without direct physical contact. Conditioned medium from BMSCs alone was not sufficient to protect myeloma cells from drug-induced apoptosis; however, soluble factors produced during the myeloma-BMSCs interaction decreased the sensitivity of myeloma cells to mitoxantrone, suggesting a dynamic interaction between myeloma cells and BMSCs. We also found that myeloma cells in direct contact with BMSCs underwent growth arrest, whereas soluble factors produced by myeloma cells-BMSCs coincubation stimulated the proliferation of myeloma cells. These data show that both cell-cell adhesion of BMSCs with myeloma cells and soluble factors induced by this cell-cell interaction are involved in the protection of myeloma cells from mitoxantrone-induced apoptosis; however, the mechanisms contributing to the drug resistance are different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12764386     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  84 in total

1.  Bone marrow fibroblasts parallel multiple myeloma progression in patients and mice: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  M A Frassanito; L Rao; M Moschetta; R Ria; L Di Marzo; A De Luisi; V Racanelli; I Catacchio; S Berardi; A Basile; E Menu; S Ruggieri; B Nico; D Ribatti; R Fumarulo; F Dammacco; K Vanderkerken; A Vacca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Apoptosis and complement-mediated lysis of myeloma cells by polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin.

Authors:  Martin S Zand; Thuong Vo; Tina Pellegrin; Raymond Felgar; Jane L Liesveld; Jainulabdeen J Ifthikharuddin; Camille N Abboud; Ignacio Sanz; Jennifer Huggins
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Environment-mediated drug resistance: a major contributor to minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Mark B Meads; Robert A Gatenby; William S Dalton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  The biology of cancer-related fatigue: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Leorey N Saligan; Karin Olson; Kristin Filler; David Larkin; Fiona Cramp; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Yennu Sriram; Carmen P Escalante; Auro del Giglio; Kord M Kober; Jayesh Kamath; Oxana Palesh; Karen Mustian
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Treatment optimization for multiple myeloma: schedule-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity of pomalidomide and carfilzomib in in vitro and ex vivo models.

Authors:  Enrica Borsi; Marina Martello; Barbara Santacroce; Elena Zamagni; Paola Tacchetti; Lucia Pantani; Katia Mancuso; Serena Rocchi; Michele Cavo; Carolina Terragna
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  EphA3 targeting reduces in vitro adhesion and invasion and in vivo growth and angiogenesis of multiple myeloma cells.

Authors:  Francesco La Rocca; Irma Airoldi; Emma Di Carlo; Pina Marotta; Geppino Falco; Vittorio Simeon; Ilaria Laurenzana; Stefania Trino; Luciana De Luca; Katia Todoerti; Oreste Villani; Martin Lackmann; Fiorella D'Auria; Francesco Frassoni; Antonino Neri; Luigi Del Vecchio; Pellegrino Musto; Daniela Cilloni; Antonella Caivano
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.730

7.  Targeting PYK2 mediates microenvironment-specific cell death in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M B Meads; B Fang; L Mathews; J Gemmer; L Nong; I Rosado-Lopez; T Nguyen; J E Ring; W Matsui; A R MacLeod; J A Pachter; L A Hazlehurst; J M Koomen; K H Shain
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Role of cell-cell communication in inhibiting butyric acid-induced T-cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Tomoko Kurita-Ochiai; Shintaro Seto; Kuniyasu Ochiai
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Vicious cycle between myeloma cell binding to bone marrow stromal cells via VLA-4-VCAM-1 adhesion and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha and MIP-1beta production.

Authors:  Masahiro Abe; Kenji Hiura; Shuji Ozaki; Shinsuke Kido; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  The role of tumour-stromal interactions in modifying drug response: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Douglas W McMillin; Joseph M Negri; Constantine S Mitsiades
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 84.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.