PURPOSE: Understanding the etiology of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is critical to identify targets to develop therapies to reduce CRF burden. The goal of this systematic review was to expand on the initial work by the National Cancer Institute CRF Working Group to understand the state of the science related to the biology of CRF and, specifically, to evaluate studies that examined the relationships between biomarkers and CRF and to develop an etiologic model of CRF to guide researchers on pathways to explore or therapeutic targets to investigate. METHODS: This review was completed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Fatigue Study Group-Biomarker Working Group. The initial search used three terms (biomarkers, fatigue, cancer), which yielded 11,129 articles. After removing duplicates, 9145 articles remained. Titles were assessed for the keywords "cancer" and "fatigue" resulting in 3811 articles. Articles published before 2010 and those with samples <50 were excluded, leaving 75 articles for full-text review. Of the 75 articles, 28 were further excluded for not investigating the associations of biomarkers and CRF. RESULTS: Of the 47 articles reviewed, 25 were cross-sectional and 22 were longitudinal studies. More than half (about 70 %) were published recently (2010-2013). Almost half (45 %) enrolled breast cancer participants. The majority of studies assessed fatigue using self-report questionnaires, and only two studies used clinical parameters to measure fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review suggest that CRF is linked to immune/inflammatory, metabolic, neuroendocrine, and genetic biomarkers. We also identified gaps in knowledge and made recommendations for future research.
PURPOSE: Understanding the etiology of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is critical to identify targets to develop therapies to reduce CRF burden. The goal of this systematic review was to expand on the initial work by the National Cancer Institute CRF Working Group to understand the state of the science related to the biology of CRF and, specifically, to evaluate studies that examined the relationships between biomarkers and CRF and to develop an etiologic model of CRF to guide researchers on pathways to explore or therapeutic targets to investigate. METHODS: This review was completed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in CancerFatigue Study Group-Biomarker Working Group. The initial search used three terms (biomarkers, fatigue, cancer), which yielded 11,129 articles. After removing duplicates, 9145 articles remained. Titles were assessed for the keywords "cancer" and "fatigue" resulting in 3811 articles. Articles published before 2010 and those with samples <50 were excluded, leaving 75 articles for full-text review. Of the 75 articles, 28 were further excluded for not investigating the associations of biomarkers and CRF. RESULTS: Of the 47 articles reviewed, 25 were cross-sectional and 22 were longitudinal studies. More than half (about 70 %) were published recently (2010-2013). Almost half (45 %) enrolled breast cancerparticipants. The majority of studies assessed fatigue using self-report questionnaires, and only two studies used clinical parameters to measure fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review suggest that CRF is linked to immune/inflammatory, metabolic, neuroendocrine, and genetic biomarkers. We also identified gaps in knowledge and made recommendations for future research.
Authors: J Paul Monk; Gary Phillips; Ross Waite; John Kuhn; Larry J Schaaf; Gregory A Otterson; Denis Guttridge; Chris Rhoades; Manisha Shah; Tamara Criswell; Michael A Caligiuri; Miguel A Villalona-Calero Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sang Mi Kwak; Youn Seon Choi; Ho Min Yoon; Dae Gyun Kim; Seung Hun Song; Young Jae Lee; Chang Hwan Yeom; Su Jin Koh; Jeanno Park; Myung Ah Lee; Sang-Yeon Suh Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Karen M Mustian; Luke J Peppone; Oxana G Palesh; Michelle C Janelsins; Supriya G Mohile; Jason Q Purnell; Tom V Darling Journal: US Oncol Date: 2009
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Kate Bak; Ann Berger; William Breitbart; Carmelita P Escalante; Patricia A Ganz; Hester Hill Schnipper; Christina Lacchetti; Jennifer A Ligibel; Gary H Lyman; Mohammed S Ogaily; William F Pirl; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kristin Valborg Reinertsen; Milada Cvancarova; Jon H Loge; Hege Edvardsen; Erik Wist; Sophie D Fosså Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Karen M Mustian; Calvin L Cole; Po Ju Lin; Matt Asare; Chunkit Fung; Michelle C Janelsins; Charles S Kamen; Luke J Peppone; Allison Magnuson Journal: Semin Oncol Nurs Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.315
Authors: John P Dougherty; Brian S Wolff; Mary J Cullen; Leorey N Saligan; Marvin C Gershengorn Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Kord M Kober; Betty Smoot; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Michele Cristina Miyauti da Silva; Luís Carlos Lopes; Lucila Castanheira Nascimento; Regina Aparecida Garcia de Lima Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2016-08-29
Authors: Elena Flowers; Annesa Flentje; Jon Levine; Adam Olshen; Marilyn Hammer; Steven Paul; Yvette Conley; Christine Miaskowski; Kord M Kober Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.522