Literature DB >> 12763272

Rats have trouble associating all three parts of the time-place-event memory code.

Christina M. Thorpe1, Mollie E. Bates, Donald M. Wilkie.   

Abstract

The ability of animals to associate an event with predictable time and place information confers a major biological advantage. The current research uses a variety of procedures and paradigms (e.g. place preference, radial arm maze, Morris water maze, T-maze, go no-go) to show that rats, unlike pigeons [e.g. Anim Learn Behav 22 (1994) 143] do not readily make an event-time-place association. They do make associations between event-time and event-place information, however. These findings are in disagreement with Gallistel's (The Organization of Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA ) theory that claims that animals automatically store a memory code that has these three pieces of information. The present research is in line with the work of others who also find that rats do not readily make daily time-place associations [Behav Processes 23 (1997) 232; Behav Processes 52 (2000) 11; Behav Processes 49 (2000) 21; Anim Learn Behav 28 (2000) 298]. An interesting finding that did emerge from the present research was that at least some rats can use a circadian timer to solve a time-of-day discrimination if the task is a go no-go discrimination.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763272     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00051-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  13 in total

1.  The effects of response cost and species-typical behaviors on a daily time-place learning task.

Authors:  Scott H Deibel; Christina M Thorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Rats in a levered T-maze task show evidence of time-place discriminations in two different measures.

Authors:  Scott H Deibel; Andrew B Lehr; Chelsea Maloney; Matthew L Ingram; Leanna M Lewis; Anne-Marie P Chaulk; Pam D Chaulk; Darlene M Skinner; Christina M Thorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The influence of temporal spacing on time-place discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Pizzo; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.

Authors:  S L Wright; G M Martin; C M Thorpe; K Haley; D M Skinner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Rats' performance on an interval time-place task: increasing sequence complexity.

Authors:  Christina M Thorpe; Donald M Wilkie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Configural integration of temporal and contextual information in rats: Automated measurement in appetitive and aversive preparations.

Authors:  Natasha M Dumigan; Tzu-Ching E Lin; Mark Good; Robert C Honey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Theoretical and conceptual issues in time-place discrimination.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Rats acquire a low-response-cost daily time-place task with differential amounts of food.

Authors:  Christina M Thorpe; Donald M Wilkie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Circadian clocks and memory: time-place learning.

Authors:  C K Mulder; M P Gerkema; E A Van der Zee
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  In a daily time-place learning task, time is only used as a discriminative stimulus if each daily session is associated with a distinct spatial location.

Authors:  Scott H Deibel; Matthew L Ingram; Andrew B Lehr; Hiliary C Martin; Darlene M Skinner; Gerard M Martin; Isaac M W Hughes; Christina M Thorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.