Literature DB >> 12762891

Clinical evaluation of intraparenchymal Spiegelberg pressure sensor.

Josef-Michael Lang1, Jürgen Beck, Michael Zimmermann, Volker Seifert, Andreas Raabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Spiegelberg 3-PN intraparenchymal pressure sensor was clinically evaluated. DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTATION: The Spiegelberg intraparenchymal pressure sensor is a low-cost device that uniquely performs regular automatic zeroing in situ throughout the measurement period. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The Spiegelberg sensor was inserted in 87 patients who required intracranial pressure monitoring as part of their routine management. Complications were assessed by postoperative computed tomographic scanning and clinical investigation. The automated zeroing procedure was assessed after implantation of the sensor and during long-term measurement. In five patients, the "gold standard' of intraventricular pressure was measured simultaneously and compared with the intraparenchymal or subdural Spiegelberg 3-PN pressure. EXPERIENCE AND
RESULTS: No complications associated with the Spiegelberg sensor were observed. The duration of monitoring ranged from 3 to 28 days (mean, 10 d). In 3 patients, technical problems occurred, and in 84 patients, the pressure measurement was successful, including the automatic zeroing procedures performed by the monitor after insertion and hourly thereafter. The absolute difference between the Spiegelberg reading and the intraventricular pressure was less than +/-3 mm Hg in 99.6% and less than +/-2 mm Hg in 91.3% of readings. An Altman-Bland bias plot revealed good agreement between the two methods, with an average bias of 0.5 mm Hg, but revealed a significant trend toward 10% lower Spiegelberg readings with increasing intracranial pressure of >25 mm Hg. There was no difference between intraparenchymal and subdural locations.
CONCLUSION: The Spiegelberg 3-PN sensor was reliable and simple to use. It can be recommended for routine intraparenchymal and subdural pressure measurement at a considerably lower price compared with other tip transducers and has the unique advantage of automated zeroing in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12762891     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000065136.70455.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy; Anthony A Figaji; M R Bullock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Neurosurgical intensive care unit--essential for good outcomes in neurosurgery?

Authors:  Josef M Lang; Jürgen Meixensberger; Andreas W Unterberg; Andreas Tecklenburg; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial.

Authors:  Kari Schirmer-Mikalsen; Anne Vik; Eirik Skogvoll; Kent Gøran Moen; Ole Solheim; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  The baseline pressure of intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors can be altered by electrostatic discharges.

Authors:  Per K Eide; André Bakken
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review.

Authors:  P H Raboel; J Bartek; M Andresen; B M Bellander; B Romner
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 6.  Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zacchetti; Sandra Magnoni; Federica Di Corte; Elisa R Zanier; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Simultaneous monitoring of static and dynamic intracranial pressure parameters from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Sverre Holm; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.