Literature DB >> 12760628

Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection.

Nick Yeung1, Stephen Monsell.   

Abstract

It has been reported that it is harder to switch to a strong, well-practiced task from a weaker, less-practiced task than vice versa. Three experiments replicated this surprising asymmetry and investigated how it is affected by a reduction in interference between tasks. Experiment 1 progressively delayed the onset of the stimulus attribute associated with the stronger task. Experiments 2 and 3 separated the response sets of the tasks. Both manipulations reduced, without eliminating, interference of the stronger with the weaker task but reversed the asymmetry of switch costs, resulting in a larger cost of switching to the weaker task. The results are interpreted in terms of a model of the interactions between control input, task strength, and task priming.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760628     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  78 in total

1.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

2.  Poor Stroop performances in 15-year-old dyslexic teenagers.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Thanh-Thuan Lê; Audrey Bonnet; Pauline Bourtoire; Emilie Demule; Caroline Fauvel; Catherine Quilicci; Qing Yang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving.

Authors:  Patrick Lemaire; Mireille Lecacheur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

4.  Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Wolfgang Prinz; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

5.  Toward a taxonomy of attention shifting: individual differences in fMRI during multiple shift types.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Edward E Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Language switching and the effects of orthographic specificity and response repetition.

Authors:  Eleni Orfanidou; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

7.  Between-task competition and cognitive control in task switching.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Leigh E Nystrom; Jessica A Aronson; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

9.  Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Cathleen Greenzang; Rebecca Hefter; Jay Edelman; Dara S Manoach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Yoko Ishigami; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.