Literature DB >> 12760461

Primary care anticoagulant management using near patient testing.

M Daly1, A W Murphy, C O'Hanlon, A Cosgrove, D McKeown, E Egan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for anticoagulant treatment are increasing and new approaches to anticoagulant services require a shift from hospital to primary care. AIM: To pragmatically test the validity and effectiveness of primary care anticoagulant management using near patient testing.
METHODS: Twelve CoaguCheck monitors were supplied to 16 rural practices that had previously provided supervision of anticoagulant therapy. Practices were required to record data for eligible patients from September 1998 to April 1999 and to forward one blood sample per week to the regional hospital laboratory for parallel testing.
RESULTS: Nine practices returned data on 122 patients. Indications for anticoagulation Included atrial fibrillation (n = 56), valve replacement (n = 12) and deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (n=12). Regression of the mean of 185 paired readings against their difference confirmed the validity of the CoaguCheck monitor (r2 = 0.00 [95% CI -0.38 to 0.38]). There were 692 International Normalised Ratio (INR) tests performed representing an average of 5.7 tests per patient. The desired therapeutic range was provided for 609 (88%) of these tests; 294 (48.3%) were within the desired therapeutic range. Results differed significantly between practices.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the validity of anticoagulant management using the CoaguCheck monitor in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760461     DOI: 10.1007/bf02914783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  25 in total

1.  A measurement of the efficacy of anticoagulation monitoring in a general practice based setting.

Authors:  M Casey; K Hanley
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2001-09

2.  Recommended method for reporting therapeutic control of oral anticoagulant therapy. Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1990-04-12       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evaluation of a primary care anticoagulant clinic managed by a pharmacist.

Authors:  S H Macgregor; J G Hamley; J A Dunbar; T R Dodd; J A Cromarty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-02

5.  Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. GPs struggle to meet demand.

Authors:  J Shakespeare
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05

6.  Validation of current practice and a near patient testing method for oral-anticoagulant control in general practice.

Authors:  D A Seamark; S Backhouse; P Barber; J Hichens; R Lee; R Powell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison.

Authors:  M E Cromheecke; M Levi; L P Colly; B J de Mol; M H Prins; B A Hutten; R Mak; K C Keyzers; H R Büller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin.

Authors:  L Poller; D Wright; M Rowlands
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  New approaches to the delivery of anticoagulant services.

Authors:  P E Rose; D Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  Anticoagulation control with warfarin by junior hospital doctors.

Authors:  N Doble; J H Baron
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.