Literature DB >> 12759267

Efficacy of the 2-staged procedure in the management of cholesteatoma.

Steven Y Ho1, John F Kveton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy of intact canal wall procedure coupled with a second-stage exploration for the treatment of cholesteatoma.
DESIGN: Retrospective case study of patients with cholesteatomas treated with staged surgical extirpation. A minimum of 6 months' postoperative follow-up time was required for inclusion into the study.
SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center. Patients A total of 35 adult and pediatric patients, ranging from 9 to 65 years of age, who underwent 2-stage procedures for removal of cholesteatomas.
INTERVENTIONS: Two-stage procedures, separated by 6 months, performed with posterior tympanotomy approaches. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence or absence of cholesteatoma on second-stage look and the subsequent surgical treatment for recurrent cholesteatoma. The overall hearing results after the completion of the 2-staged procedure were calculated.
RESULTS: Disease was controlled in 26 (74%) of the patients. Residual and/or recurrent cholesteatomas were found in 9 (26%) of the patients during the second-stage operation. Of these patients, 5 (14% of the total group) ultimately required conversion to canal-wall-down procedure. Average hearing gain at the completion of the second-stage procedure was 9 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: A planned 2-stage procedure that uses the posterior tympanotomy approach for the control of cholesteatoma is an effective technique. This approach offers significant potential for hearing preservation and restoration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759267     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.129.5.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

Review 1.  Silastic sheeting in staged ear surgery: Is there still a role for this procedure?

Authors:  Martin Müller; Flurin Honegger; Mihael Podvinec; Frank Metternich; Nicolas Gürtler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Eyes in Ears: A Miniature Steerable Digital Endoscope for Trans-Nasal Diagnosis of Middle Ear Disease.

Authors:  Joshua Gafford; Michael Freeman; Loris Fichera; Jack Noble; Robert Labadie; Robert J Webster
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma and reconstruction at the same time.

Authors:  Pedro Blanco; Francisco González; Jorge Holguín; Claudia Guerra
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Impact of the demographic and aetiological factors and intraoperative findings on postoperative outcomes in chronic otitis media surgery

Authors:  Süleyman Cebeci; Mehmet Suat Özbilen; Ismet Bayramoğlu; Yusuf Kemal Kemaloğlu; Kadir Kemal Uygur; Yildirim Ahmet Bayazit; Recep Karamert
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 0.973

5.  Trends and Healthcare Use Following Different Cholesteatoma Surgery Types in a National Cohort, 2003-2019.

Authors:  Zhen Jason Qian; Emma D Tran; Jennifer C Alyono; Alan G Cheng; Iram N Ahmad; Kay W Chang
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 6.  Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Presutti; F M Gioacchini; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Villari; D Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Identification of risk factors for residual cholesteatoma in children and adults: a retrospective study on 110 cases of revision surgery.

Authors:  Veronika Volgger; Göran Lindeskog; Eike Krause; Florian Schrötzlmair
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.