Literature DB >> 12757910

Agnosia for scenes in topographagnosia.

Mario F Mendez1, Monique M Cherrier.   

Abstract

Topographagnosia is most commonly attributed to an agnosia for landmarks. In order to define the nature of this agnosia, we studied a patient with isolated topographic disorientation (TD) after a stroke in the right medial occipitotemporal region. The patient got lost in familiar environments but could readily read and draw maps, describe familiar routes, and provide correct directions. He had normal perceptual test performance and met criteria for topographagnosia rather than for other forms of topographic disorientation. Two ecologically valid route tests assessed the nature of his agnosia. On a familiar route, he could recognize major landmarks. He could not, however, recognize route configurations made up of combinations of visual features each lacking individual distinctiveness. On a test of route learning, he learned landmarks that differed in minor details and could use them to orient himself along a route. He had difficulty, however, recognizing and learning scenes lacking salient landmarks. This agnosia for scenes was worse for semantically-related environments, but improved with semantic knowledge such as street names. In addition, the patient lacked overt prosopagnosia but tended toward semantic errors in the recognition of famous faces. Together these findings suggest that this patient's inability to recognize a route resulted from an inability of intact perceptual units for scenes, composed of specific visual configurations of individually indefinite features, from accessing stored representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757910     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00041-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  28 in total

1.  Getting lost: Topographic skills in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Corrow; Sherryse L Corrow; Edison Lee; Raika Pancaroglu; Ford Burles; Brad Duchaine; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Lindsay K Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Whitney E Parker; Alana M Feiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Emily J Ward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Mirror-image sensitivity and invariance in object and scene processing pathways.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; Joshua B Julian; Jonas Kubilius; Elizabeth S Spelke; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Kadharbatcha S Saleem; Chris I Baker; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Sharda Umanath
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Origins of landmark encoding in the brain.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Benjamin J Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Defining the most probable location of the parahippocampal place area using cortex-based alignment and cross-validation.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Michael A Barnett; Nathan Witthoft; Golijeh Golarai; Anthony Stigliani; Kendrick N Kay; Jesse Gomez; Vaidehi S Natu; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.