Literature DB >> 12757565

Decisions for hospice care in patients with advanced cancer.

Hongbin Chen1, William E Haley, Bruce E Robinson, Ronald S Schonwetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that may influence the decision of whether to enter a hospice program or to continue with a traditional hospital approach in patients with advanced cancer and to understand their decision-making process.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional structured interview.
SETTING: One community-based hospice and three university-based teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-four adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung, breast, prostate, or colon cancer with a life expectancy of less than 1 year: 173 hospice patients and 61 nonhospice patients receiving traditional hospital care. MEASUREMENTS: Hospice and nonhospice patients' demographic, clinical, and other patient-related characteristics were compared. Multivariate analysis was then conducted to identify variables associated with the hospice care decision in a logistic regression model. Information sources regarding hospice care and people involved in the hospice decision were identified.
RESULTS: Patients receiving hospice care were significantly older (average age 69 vs 65 years, P =.009) and less educated (average 11.9 vs 12.9 years, P =.031) and had more people in their households (average 1.66 vs 1.16 persons, P =.019). Hospice patients had more comorbid conditions (1.30 vs 0.93, P =.035) and worse activities of daily living scores (7.01 vs 6.23, P =.030) than nonhospice patients. Hospice patients were more realistic about their disease course than their nonhospice counterparts. Patients' understanding of their prognoses affected their perceptions of the course of their disease. Hospice patients preferred quality of life to length of life. In the multivariate analysis, lower education level and greater number of people in the household were associated with the decision to enter hospice. A healthcare provider first told most of those who entered hospice about hospice. Families largely made the final decision to enter hospice (42%), followed by patients themselves (28%) and physicians (27%).
CONCLUSION: The decision to enter hospice is related to demographic, clinical, and other patient-related characteristics. This study suggests that the decision-making process for hospice care in patients with advanced cancer is multidimensional. The healthcare community may better meet the end-of-life care needs of advanced cancer patients through enhanced communication with patients and families, including providing accurate prognoses and better understanding of patients' preferences and values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757565     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51252.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  17 in total

1.  What did you think of the hematology/oncology rotation? A survey of internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Hongbin Chen; Amir Mortazavi; Ellis Levine; Seema Kamisetti; Silpa Kamisetti; Nithya Ramnath
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; David H Gustafson; Bret R Shaw; James F Cleary
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Ethnic variation in timing of hospice referral: does having no informal caregiver matter?

Authors:  Kyusuk Chung; Elizabeth Essex; Linda F Samson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  The Developmental Transition From Living With to Dying From Cancer: Hospice Decision Making.

Authors:  Deborah Waldrop; Mary Ann Meeker; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

5.  Functional trajectories in the year before hospice.

Authors:  Hans F Stabenau; Laura J Morrison; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda Leo-Summers; Heather G Allore; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Association between advanced cancer patient-caregiver agreement regarding prognosis and hospice enrollment.

Authors:  Kelly M Trevino; Holly G Prigerson; Megan Johnson Shen; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Provider-based research networks demonstrate greater hospice use for minority patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Dolly C Penn; Karyn B Stitzenberg; Ewan K Cobran; Paul A Godley
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Perceived timeliness of referral to hospice palliative care among bereaved family members in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Jho; Yoon Jung Chang; Hye Young Song; Jin Young Choi; Yeol Kim; Eun Jung Park; Soo Jin Paek; Hee Jae Choi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life costs: why do minorities cost more than whites?

Authors:  Amresh Hanchate; Andrea C Kronman; Yinong Young-Xu; Arlene S Ash; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-09

10.  Addressing cancer patient and caregiver role transitions during home hospice nursing care.

Authors:  Janella Hudson; Maija Reblin; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.