Literature DB >> 12757447

Comparison of the effects of desloratadine 5-mg daily and placebo on nasal airflow and seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms induced by grass pollen exposure.

F Horak1, P Stübner, R Zieglmeyer, A G Harris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasal congestion is a chronic symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) that is often difficult to treat with antihistamines. Desloratadine, a new, potent, H1-receptor antagonist has been shown to decrease nasal congestion in clinical trials and to maintain nasal airflow in response to grass pollen exposure. We compared the effects of desloratadine 5 mg and placebo on nasal airflow, nasal secretion weights and SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in patients exposed to grass pollen in an environmental exposure unit.
METHODS: Forty-six grass pollen allergic SAR patients received desloratadine or placebo for 7 days, followed by a 10-day washout, and then crossed over to the other treatment for 7 days. A 6-h allergen exposure was performed at the end of each treatment period.
RESULTS: Desloratadine was significantly superior to placebo in maintaining nasal airflow (P <or= 0.014) and lessening the increase in nasal secretion weights (P < 0.001) throughout allergen exposure. SAR symptom scores, including nasal congestion, were significantly less with desloratadine than placebo (P <or= 0.001). Desloratadine was well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that, compared with placebo, desloratadine can maintain nasal airflow and reduce nasal secretion weights and the severity of SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in SAR patients exposed to grass pollen allergen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757447     DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  8 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.

Authors:  William E Berger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities and Their Unique Contributions to Allergic Rhinitis Research.

Authors:  Michelle L North; Mena Soliman; Terry Walker; Lisa M Steacy; Anne K Ellis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Latest developments in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Alvin M Sanico
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.667

5.  The effects of bilastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine, and placebo on allergen-induced nasal and ocular symptoms in patients exposed to aeroallergen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak; Petra Zieglmayer; René Zieglmayer; Patrick Lemell
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 6.  Desloratadine: an update of its efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  David Murdoch; Karen L Goa; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effectiveness of twice daily azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Treatment of allergic rhinitis with desloratadine: results of a multinational observational study in the middle East gulf region.

Authors:  Tamer M H Adham
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.084

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.