Literature DB >> 12756497

Prognosis of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving either induction or noncurative treatment: a single-center retrospective study.

B Behringer1, J A Pitako, R Kunzmann, C Schmoor, D Behringer, R Mertelsmann, M Lübbert.   

Abstract

Since few studies focus on prognostic factors in unselected elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, a retrospective analysis of 138 consecutive patients aged >55 years (median age: 67, range: 56-89) with AML diagnosed at a single center over an 8-year period was performed: 69% had de novo AML and 31% secondary (s) AML; 67% of the patients were karyotyped. Of the patients, 73 (53%) were treated with standard induction therapy protocols and 65 (47%) received palliative treatment only. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effects of the following factors on overall survival (OS) were performed: sex, age > or = vs <65 years, de novo vs sAML, serum (s) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > or = vs <400 U/l, leukocytes > or = vs <50,000/ microl, induction therapy, and karyotype. Additionally, in patients receiving induction therapy, complete remission (CR) rates and survival from CR were analyzed. CR rate was 47% [95% confidence interval (35%, 59%)], 53% (39%, 66%) in de novo AML, and 21% (5%, 51%) in sAML. After a median follow-up of 4 years, 130 deaths were observed (94%). In a univariate analysis, significant factors for longer OS were induction therapy, age <65 years, sLDH <400 U/l, and de novo AML. In a multivariate analysis, significant factors for longer OS were sLDH <400 U/l and induction therapy. However, the difference between treatment outcome may also be due to selection criteria not captured, such as performance status, comorbid conditions, wish of the patient, etc. The effects of intensive and nonintensive treatment in this patient group need to be investigated in prospective, randomized trials in which these clinical parameters of high relevance for treatment decisions in older patients are also considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12756497     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-003-0650-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  11 in total

1.  Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome.

Authors:  Barbara Deschler; Gabriele Ihorst; Uwe Platzbecker; Ulrich Germing; Eva März; Marcelo de Figuerido; Kurt Fritzsche; Peter Haas; Helmut R Salih; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; Boris Labar; Theo de Witte; Pierre Wijermans; Michael Lübbert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Glycolytic reliance promotes anabolism in photoreceptors.

Authors:  Yashodhan Chinchore; Tedi Begaj; David Wu; Eugene Drokhlyansky; Constance L Cepko
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Association of ABCB1 polymorphisms with prognostic outcomes of anthracycline and cytarabine in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hui He; Jiye Yin; Xi Li; Yu Zhang; Xiaojing Xu; Ming Zhai; Juan Chen; Chenyue Qian; Honghao Zhou; Zhaoqian Liu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Geriatric assessment in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study of associated treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander E Sherman; Gabriela Motyckova; K Rebecca Fega; Daniel J Deangelo; Gregory A Abel; David Steensma; Martha Wadleigh; Richard M Stone; Jane A Driver
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Comparison of epigenetic versus standard induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥60 years old.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Austin Miller; Shipra Gandhi; Laurie A Ford; Carlos E Vigil; Elizabeth A Griffiths; James E Thompson; Meir Wetzler; Eunice S Wang
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Challenges in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lagadinou D Eleni; Zoumbos C Nicholas; Spyridonidis Alexandros
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Cell-state-specific metabolic dependency in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Ying-Hua Wang; William J Israelsen; Dongjun Lee; Vionnie W C Yu; Nathaniel T Jeanson; Clary B Clish; Lewis C Cantley; Matthew G Vander Heiden; David T Scadden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Pretreatment cytogenetics add to other prognostic factors predicting complete remission and long-term outcome in patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461.

Authors:  Sherif S Farag; Kellie J Archer; Krzysztof Mrózek; Amy S Ruppert; Andrew J Carroll; James W Vardiman; Mark J Pettenati; Maria R Baer; Mazin B Qumsiyeh; Prasad R Koduru; Yi Ning; Robert J Mayer; Richard M Stone; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Easily manageable prognostic factors in 152 Chinese elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiadai Xu; Tingmei Chen; Yun Liu; Huayuan Zhu; Wei Wu; WenYi Shen; Bei Xu; Sixuan Qian; Jianyong Li; Peng Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-02-20

10.  Survival and hospitalization among patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine or decitabine in a large managed care population: a real-world, retrospective, claims-based, comparative analysis.

Authors:  B Douglas Smith; Dalia Mahmoud; Henry J Henk; Charles L Beach; Laura Weber
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.