Literature DB >> 1275589

Sphincteroplasty and choledochoduodenostomy for benign biliary obstructions.

R H Rutledge.   

Abstract

Both sphincteroplasty and choledochoduodenostomy are valuable for choledocholithiasis, stenosis of the terminal bile duct, and occasional cases of pancreatitis. Selection of patients, technical details, and advantages and limitations of both operative procedures are presented. In a personal series of 600 benign biliary operations 73 patients had a sphincteroplasty or choledochoduodenostomy. Sixty of these had a sphincteroplasty without operative mortality, serious complication, or recurrence of biliary problems although 5 still have pain. A positive morphine-prostigmine test was a prime indication for surgery in these 5 patients. The evocative tests are now negative. Thirteen patients had a choledochonduodenostomy without mortality or significant complication. Twelve are symptom free but one has a "sump syndrome." Sphincteroplasty has been preferred because it gives dependent drainage, direct inspection of the ampullary area, and facilitates removal of impacted stones and debris. It is not always applicable and choledochoduodenostomy has been chosen in elderly poor risk patients or in those with pancreatic inflammation or periampullary duodenal diverticula. Both operations have specific advantages and limitations such that the surgeon should not use one to the exclusion of the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1275589      PMCID: PMC1344328          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197605000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  43 in total

1.  Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  S O Hoerr; R E Hermann
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Indications for sphincteroplasty as opposed to choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  T T White
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Measurement of stoma size following choledochoduodenostomy by transduodenal cholangiography.

Authors:  J M Ham; W Sorby
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Late results of side to side choledochoduodenostomy and of transduodenal sphincterotomy for benign disorders. A twenty year comparative study.

Authors:  M Stuart; S O Hoerr
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The common duct after cholecystectomy. Interval report.

Authors:  R Edmunds; S Katz; V Garciano; N Finby
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1971-07

6.  Management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  L W Way; W H Admirand; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Choledochoduodenostomy. A reappraisal of its indications based on a study of 64 patients.

Authors:  A G Johnson; A J Rains
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J L Mullen; F E Rosato; E F Rosato; W T Miller; M Sullivan
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-11

9.  Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure?

Authors:  J L Madden; J Y Chun; S Kandalaft; M Parekh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Spasm and operative cholangiography.

Authors:  K C Chessick; S Black; S J Hoye
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-01
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5 to 15 years.

Authors:  A Escudero-Fabre; A Escallon; J Sack; N B Halpern; J S Aldrete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Experience with sphincteroplasty and sphincterotomy in pancreatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  T M Anderson; H A Pitt; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Surgical palliation of unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  M G Sarr; J L Cameron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Long-term experience with transection choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; R A Wood; M J Metcalf; J G Cumming
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Is choledochoduodenostomy in the treatment of stones in the common bile duct an obsolete technique?

Authors:  L Cubillos; R Fiallo; J Rodriguez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [Surgical papillotomy, endoscopic-manometric and clinical results (author's transl)].

Authors:  T Heil; D Belohlavek; N Merkle; E U Voss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1978-06-28

7.  Primary common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J L Madden
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The prevention and treatment of recurrent bile duct stones by transduodenal sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  S A Jones
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  [Benign stenosis of the papilla (author's transl)].

Authors:  H P Eichfuss; V Schumpelick; H W Schreiber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1980

10.  Recurrent bile duct stones after transduodenal sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  S M G Kibria; R Hall
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.