Literature DB >> 12754070

Hit/Miss monitoring of ESWL by spectral Doppler ultrasound.

Christian Bohris1, Thomas Bayer, Christian Lechner.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate spectral Doppler ultrasound (US) for monitoring extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). In vitro experiments with model stones showed that Doppler spectra acquired after a shock wave hit result in a high peak followed by a decaying signal. The duration of decay was dependent on shock-wave energy, stone size, gas content of the water and the level of disintegration. It typically ranged from 30 ms to 150 ms. It was found, by comparison with optical high-speed imaging and US B-scan imaging, that the signal originated from fragments released by the stone and cavitation. If the monitored volume contained no target, the signal duration was significantly shorter. By this means, hits were reliably distinguished from misses. The results of clinical treatments were highly consistent with those of in vitro experiments. Therefore, spectral Doppler US is an excellent tool for hit/miss monitoring in ESWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12754070     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00773-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

1.  [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Past, present and future].

Authors:  C Chaussy; T Bergsdorf; S Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Anup R Shah; Ryan S Hsi; Marla Paun; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Variations of stress field and stone fracture produced at different lateral locations in a shockwave lithotripter field.

Authors:  Gaoming Xiang; Xiaojian Ma; Cosima Liang; Hongyang Yu; Defei Liao; Georgy Sankin; Shunxiang Cao; Kevin Wang; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 5.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Besien; Pieter Uvin; Isabeau Hermie; Thomas Tailly; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy today.

Authors:  Geert G Tailly
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

Review 9.  Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Luke F Reynolds; Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.