Literature DB >> 12752163

Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best".

Edwin R van Teijlingen1, Vanora Hundley, Ann-Marie Rennie, Wendy Graham, Ann Fitzmaurice.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health policymakers throughout the developed world are paying close attention to factors in maternity care that may influence women's satisfaction. This paper examines some of these factors in the light of observations from previous studies of satisfaction with health services.
METHODS: The Scottish Birth Study, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, sought the views of all women in Scotland delivering during a 10-day period in 1998. A total of 1,137 women completed and returned questionnaires (response rate = 69%).
RESULTS: Women were overwhelmingly satisfied with their prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care. As is common in this type of study, reports of dissatisfaction were relatively low. However, differences occurred in satisfaction levels between subgroups; for example, the fewer the number of caregivers the woman had during childbirth, the more likely she was to be satisfied with the care received. A range of factors appeared to influence reported satisfaction levels, such as characteristics of the care provided and the woman's psychosocial circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the inherent limitations of satisfaction studies found in the literature, problems may arise if such surveys are used uncritically to shape the future provision of maternity services, because service users tend to value the status quo over innovations of which they have no experience. Therefore, although satisfaction surveys have a role to play, we argue that they should only be used with caution, and preferably as part of an array of tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752163     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00224.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  48 in total

1.  Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Authors:  Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Vilhjálmur Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

2.  Pass It On: A Commentary on Listening to Mothers II.

Authors:  Marilyn Curl
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

3.  Shaping public opinion on the issue of childbirth; a critical analysis of articles published in an Australian newspaper.

Authors:  Meredith J McIntyre; Karen Francis; Ysanne Chapman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views.

Authors:  Lindsay F P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Childhood maltreatment history, posttraumatic relational sequelae, and prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Sue Anne Bell; Julia Seng
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013-06-17

Review 6.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Delivering information: a descriptive study of Australian women's information needs for decision-making about birth facility.

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Aleena M Wojcieszek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Satisfaction with maternity care among recent migrants: an interview questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Bains; Johanne Sundby; Benedikte V Lindskog; Siri Vangen; Lien M Diep; Katrine M Owe; Ingvil K Sorbye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women?

Authors:  F Jafari; H Eftekhar; K Mohammad; A Fotouhi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Parents' experiences and satisfaction with care during the birth of their very preterm baby: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Sawyer; H Rabe; J Abbott; G Gyte; L Duley; S Ayers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.