Literature DB >> 12751800

Are fingers special? Evidence about movement preparation from event-related brain potentials.

Nele Wild-Wall1, Jörg Sangals, Werner Sommer, Hartmut Leuthold.   

Abstract

Ulrich, Leuthold, and Sommer (1998) suggested that movement preparation at the level of the motor cortex, as indexed by the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), proceeds in a strongly hierarchical fashion, where parameters other than response hand are prepared only if all the movement parameters are known. These conclusions were based on an experiment where a precue provided information about response hand, direction of finger movement, and movement force. To assess the generality of these findings, we replaced the force parameter with response finger. LRP indicated that preparation of the required finger is possible even when preliminary information is incomplete. Therefore, movement preparation appears to follow different rules when anatomical relationships (hand and finger) are concerned as compared to functional parameters like movement direction. On the other hand, at a limb-unspecific level, as indicated by the contingent negative variation, we confirmed evidence for parallel programming of all movement parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751800     DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Relationship between plantar-flexor torque generation and the magnitude of the movement-related potentials.

Authors:  Omar Feix do Nascimento; Kim Dremstrup Nielsen; Michael Voigt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On the equivalence of executed and imagined movements: evidence from lateralized motor and nonmotor potentials.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Simon Mathews; Phil J A Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The oddball effect on P3 disappears when feature relevance or feature-response mappings are unknown.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Magdalena Keppeler; Jona Sassenhagen; Kamila Śmigasiewicz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Methylphenidate (MPH) promotes visual cortical activation in healthy adults in a cued visuomotor task.

Authors:  Yordan Hodzhev; Juliana Yordanova; Martin Diruf; Oliver Kratz; Gunter H Moll; Vasil Kolev; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Task complexity differentially affects executed and imagined movement preparation: evidence from movement-related potentials.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Simon Mathews; Philip Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Automatic motor activation by mere instruction.

Authors:  Tom Everaert; Marijke Theeuwes; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourtis; Mateusz Woźniak; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Annet Bluschke; Maximilian Kleimaker; Alexander Münchau; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task.

Authors:  Alexander C Conley; W R Fulham; Jodie L Marquez; Mark W Parsons; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.