Literature DB >> 12751283

Accuracy and reproducibility of CFD predicted wall shear stress using 3D ultrasound images.

A D Augst1, D C Barratt, A D Hughes, F P Glor, S A McG Thom, X Y Xu.   

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow simulation techniques have the potential to enhance our understanding of how haemodynamic factors are involved in atherosclerosis. Recently, 3D ultrasound has emerged as an alternative to other 3D imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The method can be used to generate realistic vascular geometry suitable for CFD simulations. In order to assess accuracy and reproducibility of the procedure from image acquisition to reconstruction to CFD simulation, a human carotid artery bifurcation phantom was scanned three times using 3D ultrasound. The geometry was reconstructed and flow simulations were carried out on the three sets as well as on a model generated using computer aided design (CAD) from the geometric information given by the manufacturer. It was found that the three reconstructed sets showed good reproducibility as well as satisfactory quantitative agreement with the CAD model. Analyzing two selected locations probably representing the 'worst cases,' accuracy comparing ultrasound and CAD reconstructed models was estimated to be between 7.2% and 7.7% of the maximum instantaneous WSS and reproducibility comparing the three scans to be between 8.2% and 10.7% of their average maximum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751283     DOI: 10.1115/1.1553973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  10 in total

Review 1.  Introduction to the biomechanics of carotid plaque pathogenesis and rupture: review of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  G C Makris; A N Nicolaides; X Y Xu; G Geroulakos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Flow characteristics in a canine aneurysm model: a comparison of 4D accelerated phase-contrast MR measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Kevin Johnson; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Kent-Andre Mardal; Oliver Wieben; Charles Strother
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Human Pulmonary Arteries with Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Alifer D Bordones; Matthew Leroux; Vitaly O Kheyfets; Yu-An Wu; Chia-Yuan Chen; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations.

Authors:  Yiemeng Hoi; Scott H Woodward; Minsuok Kim; Dale B Taulbee; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Flow and myocardial interaction: an imaging perspective.

Authors:  Guang-Zhong Yang; Robert Merrifield; Sharmeen Masood; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Inter-operator Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Prediction of Cerebrospinal Fluid Motion in the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Bryn A Martin; Theresia I Yiallourou; Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Suraj Thyagaraj; Alexander C Bunck; Francis Loth; Daniel B Sheffer; Jan Robert Kröger; Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Accuracy of computational cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics using patient-specific endovascular measurements.

Authors:  Patrick M McGah; Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Ryan P Morton; John D Nerva; Pierre D Mourad; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Danial K Hallam; Laligam N Sekhar; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Low wall shear stress predicts subsequent development of wall hypertrophy in lower limb bypass grafts.

Authors:  Mark Jackson; Nigel B Wood; Shunzhi Zhao; Alexander Augst; John H Wolfe; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Alun D Hughes; Simon A McG Thom; Xiao Y Xu
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 0.597

Review 9.  Computational Hemodynamic Modeling of Arterial Aneurysms: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Sarah N Lipp; Elizabeth E Niedert; Hannah L Cebull; Tyler C Diorio; Jessica L Ma; Sean M Rothenberger; Kimberly A Stevens Boster; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  3-D Flow Reconstruction Using Divergence-Free Interpolation of Multiple 2-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Particle Imaging Velocimetry Measurements.

Authors:  Xinhuan Zhou; Virginie Papadopoulou; Chee Hau Leow; Peter Vincent; Meng-Xing Tang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.998

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.