Literature DB >> 12750991

Contribution of relative growth rate to root foraging by annual and perennial grasses from California oak woodlands.

Zachary T Aanderud1, Caroline S Bledsoe, James H Richards.   

Abstract

Plants forage for nutrients by increasing their root length density (RLD) in nutrient-rich soil microsites through root morphological changes resulting in increased root biomass density (RBD), specific root length (SRL), or branching frequency (BF). It is commonly accepted that fast-growing species will forage more than slow-growing species. However, foraging responses may be due solely to differences in relative growth rates (RGR). There is little evidence, after the effects of RGR are removed, that the fast versus slow foraging theory is correct. In a pot study, we evaluated foraging of four grass species that differed in RGR: one fast-growing annual species, Bromus diandrus, two intermediate-growing species, annual Bromus hordeaceus and perennial Elymus glaucus, and one slow-growing perennial species, Nassella pulchra. We harvested plants either at a common time (plants varied in size) or at a common leaf number (plants similar size, surrogate for common biomass). By evaluating species at a common time, RGR influenced foraging. Conversely, by evaluating species at a common leaf number, foraging could be evaluated independent of RGR. When RGR was allowed to contribute to foraging (common time harvest), foraging and RGR were positively correlated. B. diandrus (fast RGR) foraged to a greater extent than did E. glaucus (intermediate RGR) and N. pulchra (slow RGR). E. glaucus (intermediate RGR) foraged to a greater extent than N. pulchra (slow RGR). Root growth within nutrient-rich microsites was due to significant increases in RBD, not to modifications of SRL or BF. However, when RGR was not allowed to influence foraging (common leaf number harvest), none of the four species significantly enhanced RLD in nutrient-rich compared to control microsites. This suggests that RGR strongly influenced the ability of these grass species to forage and also supports the need to evaluate plastic root traits independent of RGR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750991     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1275-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants.

Authors:  J S Coleman; K D McConnaughay; D D Ackerly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Root proliferation characteristics of seven perennial arid-land grasses in nutrient-enriched microsites.

Authors:  A Larigauderie; J H Richards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Quantification of plasticity of plant traits in response to light intensity: comparing phenotypes at a common weight.

Authors:  Stanley A Rice; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Fine root growth and demographic responses to nutrient patches in four old-field plant species.

Authors:  Katherine L Gross; Andrew Peters; Kurt S Pregitzer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Capture and allocation of nitrogen byQuercus douglasii seedlings in competition with annual and perennial grasses.

Authors:  J M Welker; D R Gordon; K J Rice
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Elevated CO2 and plant nitrogen-use: is reduced tissue nitrogen concentration size-dependent?

Authors:  J S Coleman; K D M McConnaughay; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition of perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient availability.

Authors:  Bart Fransen; Hans de Kroon; Frank Berendse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Foraging for nutrients, responses to changes in light, and competition in tropical deciduous tree seedlings.

Authors:  Pilar Huante; Emmanuel Rincón; F Stuart Chapin Iii
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Shading and the capture of localized soil nutrients: nutrient contents, carbohydrates, and root uptake kinetics of a perennial tussock grass.

Authors:  R B Jackson; M M Caldwell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrate supply of an inherently fast-growing species from a fertile habitat and an inherently slow-growing species from an infertile habitat.

Authors:  C A D M Van de Vijver; R G A Boot; H Poorter; H Lambers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Root foraging for patchy resources in eight herbaceous plant species.

Authors:  Tara K Rajaniemi; Heather L Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Improving the scale and precision of hypotheses to explain root foraging ability.

Authors:  Steven W Kembel; Hans De Kroon; James F Cahill; Liesje Mommer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Nitrogen sink strength of ectomycorrhizal morphotypes of Quercus douglasii, Q. garryana, and Q. agrifolia seedlings grown in a northern California oak woodland.

Authors:  X H He; W R Horwath; R J Zasoski; Z Aanderud; C S Bledsoe
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  A nitrogen fertilization field study of carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 transfers in ectomycorrhizas of Pinus sabiniana.

Authors:  María Victoria Albarracín; Johan Six; Benjamin Z Houlton; Caroline S Bledsoe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion.

Authors:  Courtney L J Rowe; Elizabeth A Leger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Evolution of root plasticity responses to variation in soil nutrient distribution and concentration.

Authors:  Judah D Grossman; Kevin J Rice
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Root Foraging Performance and Life-History Traits.

Authors:  Martin Weiser; Tomáš Koubek; Tomáš Herben
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.