Literature DB >> 12748847

Determination of intact splenic weight based on morcellated weight.

R M Walsh1, B Chand, J Brodsky, B T Heniford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of splenic size based on splenic weight are difficult after laparoscopic splenectomy, which results in a morcellated specimen. We report the results of a direct comparison between morcellated and intact splenic weights.
METHODS: Porcine spleens were harvested via a midline laparotomy, and an intact splenic weight was obtained, which served as the control. The spleen then was placed into an impermeable retrieval bag and returned to the peritoneal cavity. A separate 10-mm incision was made and the spleen mechanically morcellated with a uterine forceps. This design most faithfully recreates the morcellation process during laparoscopic splenectomy in humans. The aggregate weight of the fragments was compared with intact splenic weight.
RESULTS: Intact and morcellated weights were obtained from 58 porcine spleens. The mean intact splenic weight was 145 g, and the mean morcellated weight was 78 g. For a given morcellated weight achieved at laparoscopic splenectomy, an estimated intact weight can be determined by the following formula: intact weight (g) = morcellated weight (g) x 1.34 + 45.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our calculations, a normal spleen weighing 150 g would have a mean morcellated weight of 78 g, and splenomegaly (intact spleen weighing 250 g or more) would be defined by a morcellated weight exceeding 153 g.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748847     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8223-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). A five-year experience.

Authors:  C J Stanton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Determination of intact splenic weight based on morcellated weight.

Authors:  R M Walsh; B Chand; J Brodsky; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Estimation of splenic weight from ultrasonographic measurements.

Authors:  M T Downey
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  The ascendance of laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  R M Walsh; B T Heniford; F Brody; J Ponsky
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Weight of the spleen. I. Range of normal in a nonhospital population.

Authors:  J Myers; R J Segal
Journal:  Arch Pathol       Date:  1974-07

6.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura--long-term result of 40 laparoscopic splenectomies.

Authors:  C W Chung; W J Lee; J S Choi; Y W Ko; J S Han; Y H Min; B R Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 7.  Laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  N Katkhouda; E Mavor
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome. A comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E M Targarona; J J Espert; G Cerdán; C Balagué; J Piulachs; G Sugrañes; V Artigas; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Splenomegaly at a United States County Hospital: diagnostic evaluation of 170 patients.

Authors:  R A O'Reilly
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.378

10.  Optimizing laparoscopic splenectomy. Technical details and experience in 59 patients.

Authors:  A Szold; B Sagi; H Merhav; J M Klausner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Determination of intact splenic weight based on morcellated weight.

Authors:  R M Walsh; B Chand; J Brodsky; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy is emerging 'gold standard' treatment even for massive spleens.

Authors:  S K Somasundaram; L Massey; D Gooch; J Reed; D Menzies
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Contemporary pediatric splenectomy: continuing controversies.

Authors:  James H Wood; David A Partrick; Taru Hays; Angela Sauaia; Frederick M Karrer; Moritz M Ziegler
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis : to preserve the upper or the lower pole of the spleen?

Authors:  C Vasilescu; O Stanciulea; S Tudor; D Stanescu; A Colita; R Stoia; D Coriu; A Colita; C Arion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear.

Authors:  Reuben D Shin; Roger Lis; Nicholas R Levergood; David C Brooks; Brent T Shoji; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.