Literature DB >> 12748470

Cancer patients' satisfaction with physicians: Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction with Doctor Questionnaire results.

Charles N Landen1, Novie O Younger, Beth A Collins Sharp, Paul B Underwood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to examine the satisfaction of a specific population of oncology patients with their physicians and to quantify its association with characteristics of their disease. STUDY
DESIGN: A descriptive design was used in which patients attending a weekend cancer support retreat completed the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction with Doctor Questionnaire (PMH-PSQ-MD). Demographic information was requested separately.
RESULTS: Of 48 patients, 96% completed the PMH-PSQ-MD, and 67% mailed in the additional demographics. Average overall score was 3.08 (SD = 0.56, 4 being most satisfied). Patients reported a desire for more time with physicians and that their pain be better understood. Patients were most satisfied with the physician's honesty, thoroughness, and communication. Satisfaction scores did not correlate with intensity of treatment or time since diagnosis. Scores declined as financial burden of therapy increased, but the trend was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Patients attending this retreat were generally satisfied with their physicians, regardless of treatment intensity. Increasing financial burden may be associated with physician dissatisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748470     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Adriana Toro; Simonetta Pozzi; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  No impact of central venous insertion site on oncology patients' quality of life and psychological distress. A randomized three-arm trial.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Franco Orsi; Simonetta Pozzi; Andrea Maldifassi; Davide Radice; Nicole Rotmensz; Maria Giulia Zampino; Nicola Fazio; Giulia Peruzzotti; Florence Didier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Pilot evaluation of a French interdisciplinary supportive care department.

Authors:  Anne Brédart; Sylvie Dolbeault; Alexia Savignoni; Sébastien Simard; Stéphanie Gomme; Bernard Asselain; Laure Copel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Is Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Related to the Quality of Patient Care Experiences?

Authors:  Taara Prasad; Eugenia Buta; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Psychosocial and clinical predictors of patient satisfaction with cancer care.

Authors:  Fahad D Alosaimi; Futoon S Alsaleh; Luluh Y Alsughayer; Lamees A Altamimi; Ibrahim A Alfurayh; Nashwa M Abdel-Aziz; Khalid A Alsaleh
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher G Lis; Mark Rodeghier; Digant Gupta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Gynecologic oncology patients' satisfaction and symptom severity during palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vivian E von Gruenigen; Jessica R Hutchins; Anne Marie Reidy; Heidi E Gibbons; Barbara J Daly; Elisa M Eldermire; Nancy L Fusco
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.