PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This pilot study was designed to evaluate the impact of management by the Interdisciplinary Supportive Care Department for Cancer Patients (Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie-DISSPO) at the Institut Curie in Paris, France on patient quality of life and satisfaction with care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients hospitalised for cancer treatment and referred to DISSPO during their hospitalisation were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and patient satisfaction (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) questionnaires during the week following their initial management by DISSPO (T0) and 2 months later (T1). These patients were compared with control patients matched for age, gender, ward and period of hospitalisation in terms of quality of life and satisfaction with care. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fourteen (77%) DISSPO patients at T0 and 72 (48%) patients at T1 and 102 (89%) control patients at T0 and 66 (57%) at T1 returned their completed questionnaires. Baseline characteristics of DISSPO patients and control patients were significantly different in terms of duration of the current hospitalisation, interval between the date of diagnosis of the cancer and inclusion in the study (both longer for DISSPO patients) and Karnofsky performance status (lower for DISSPO patients). For the 43 pairs of patients who completed the questionnaires at the two time points, significant independent positive effects of management by DISSPO and age (less than or equal to 60 years) were demonstrated for patient satisfaction in relation to the availability of the nursing and paramedical team. In particular, patients over the age of 60 not managed by DISSPO presented a significant reduction of patient satisfaction scores over the 2 months compared to age-matched patients managed by DISSPO. CONCLUSIONS: Management of cancer patients by an interdisciplinary supportive care department appears to have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in relation to availability of the nursing and paramedical team. These results need to be confirmed in a larger study.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This pilot study was designed to evaluate the impact of management by the Interdisciplinary Supportive Care Department for CancerPatients (Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie-DISSPO) at the Institut Curie in Paris, France on patient quality of life and satisfaction with care. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients hospitalised for cancer treatment and referred to DISSPO during their hospitalisation were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and patient satisfaction (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) questionnaires during the week following their initial management by DISSPO (T0) and 2 months later (T1). These patients were compared with control patients matched for age, gender, ward and period of hospitalisation in terms of quality of life and satisfaction with care. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fourteen (77%) DISSPO patients at T0 and 72 (48%) patients at T1 and 102 (89%) control patients at T0 and 66 (57%) at T1 returned their completed questionnaires. Baseline characteristics of DISSPO patients and control patients were significantly different in terms of duration of the current hospitalisation, interval between the date of diagnosis of the cancer and inclusion in the study (both longer for DISSPO patients) and Karnofsky performance status (lower for DISSPO patients). For the 43 pairs of patients who completed the questionnaires at the two time points, significant independent positive effects of management by DISSPO and age (less than or equal to 60 years) were demonstrated for patient satisfaction in relation to the availability of the nursing and paramedical team. In particular, patients over the age of 60 not managed by DISSPO presented a significant reduction of patient satisfaction scores over the 2 months compared to age-matched patients managed by DISSPO. CONCLUSIONS: Management of cancerpatients by an interdisciplinary supportive care department appears to have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in relation to availability of the nursing and paramedical team. These results need to be confirmed in a larger study.
Authors: A M Colussi; L Mazzer; D Candotto; M De Biasi; L De Lorenzi; I Pin; N Pusiol; C Romanin; V Zamattio Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; John Michael Bostwick; Pamela J Atherton; Mary E Johnson; Gail Gamble; Jarrett Richardson; Paul Brown; James Martensen; Janis Miller; Katherine Piderman; Mashele Huschka; Jean Girardi; Jean Hanson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David P Smith; Rajah Supramaniam; Madeleine T King; Jeanette Ward; Martin Berry; Bruce K Armstrong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Brédart; V Mignot; A Rousseau; S Dolbeault; N Beauloye; V Adam; C Elie; I Léonard; B Asselain; T Conroy Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2004-08
Authors: Ivan Krakowski; François Boureau; Roland Bugat; Laurent Chassignol; Philippe Colombat; Laure Copel; Daniel d'Hérouville; Marylène Filbet; Bernard Laurent; Nadine Memran; Jacques Meynadier; Gérard Parmentier; Philippe Poulain; Pierre Saltel; Daniel Serin; Jean-Philippe Wagner Journal: Bull Cancer Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 1.276
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; Edwina S Baskin-Bey; Mark Watson; Andrew Worsfold; Alex Rider; Bertrand Tombal Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 2.264