Literature DB >> 12748436

Attitudes towards genetic screening for predisposition to colon cancer among cancer patients, their relatives and members of the community. Results of focus group interviews.

Scott D Ramsey1, Susan Wilson, Anna Spencer, Antoinette Geidzinska, Polly Newcomb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare knowledge of and interest in genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer syndromes.
METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients, first-degree relatives of colon cancer patients and controls were recruited from a familial cancer registry. Focus groups explored attitudes about genetic testing.
RESULTS: All three groups conveyed interest in testing, but lacked knowledge about testing and its implications. After receiving information regarding the potential benefits and costs of testing (including insurance and employment issues) all three groups were disinclined to be tested. The reasons varied among risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: When informed about the costs and implications of testing, individuals may be reluctant to undergo genetic testing, regardless of baseline risk. Barriers to testing will vary depending on the perceived risk of carrying a mutation. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748436     DOI: 10.1159/000069543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  12 in total

1.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; B J Wilson; S M Craigie; H Etchegary; D Castle; J C Carroll; B K Potter; L Lemyre; J Little
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Tracy Waldeck; Gloria M Petersen; Diana Miglioretti; Jill D Trimbath; Miriam A Tillery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Preferences for genetic testing to identify hereditary colorectal cancer: perspectives of high-risk patients, community members, and clinicians.

Authors:  Judith Walsh; Millie Arora; Christina Hosenfeld; Uri Ladabaum; Miriam Kuppermann; Sara J Knight
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  "The cancer bond": exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Laura M Koehly; Susan K Peterson; Margarette Shegog; Sally W Vernon; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Teri L Malo; Tuya Pal; David Shibata; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-01-06

7.  Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Cyr; Tim Allen Dunnagan; George Haynes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Jamilyn M Zepp; Mari J Gilmore; James V Davis; Elizabeth J Esterberg; Kristin R Muessig; Susan K Peterson; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Jacob A Reiss; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Ethical and public health implications of genetic testing for suicide risk: family and survivor perspectives.

Authors:  Brent M Kious; Anna R Docherty; Jeffrey R Botkin; Teneille R Brown; Leslie P Francis; Douglas D Gray; Brooks R Keeshin; Louisa A Stark; Brieanne Witte; Hilary Coon
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.