Literature DB >> 12747521

Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging?

Aharon Finestone1, Tuvia Schlesinger, Hagay Amir, Elihu Richter, Charles Milgrom.   

Abstract

Proper use of medical imaging tools requires knowledge of their associated radiation risks, as well as their possible benefits. The authors assessed physicians' knowledge of the radiation risks associated with bone scintigraphy (bone scan) during an annual meeting of the Israeli Orthopedic Society. The mortality risk of radiation-induced carcinoma from bone scan was identified correctly by less than 5% of respondents. The most frequent answer (38.4%) was the option that was least correct. Senior orthopedists estimated lower risks than did residents. Overall, respondents grossly underestimated the potential radiation risk from bone scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12747521     DOI: 10.3200/AEOH.58.1.59-62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Health        ISSN: 0003-9896


  12 in total

Review 1.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children: new evidence and perspectives from a biomarker approach.

Authors:  Lamia Ait-Ali; Ilenia Foffa; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-10-17

Review 3.  Imaging of lower extremity stress fracture injuries.

Authors:  Daniel S Moran; Rachel K Evans; Eran Hadad
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update.

Authors:  F Ramsthaler; P Proschek; W Betz; M A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Clinicians' justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role?

Authors:  Lars Borgen; Erling Stranden; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-23

6.  Economic and biological costs of cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 7.  The biological effects of diagnostic cardiac imaging on chronically exposed physicians: the importance of being non-ionizing.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 2.062

8.  The risks of inappropriateness in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Radiological informed consent in cardiovascular imaging: towards the medico-legal perfect storm?

Authors:  Gigliola Bedetti; Cosimo Loré
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  A prospective study assessing clinicians attitude and knowledge on radiation exposure to patients during radiological investigations.

Authors:  Paramdeep Singh; Simmi Aggarwal; Amteshwar Mohan Singh Kapoor; Rupinderjeet Kaur; Amarpreet Kaur
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.