Literature DB >> 12747504

Decision making under conflict: decision time as a measure of conflict strength.

Adele Diederich1.   

Abstract

Conflict and choice are closely related in that choice produces conflict and conflict is resolved by making a choice. Although conflict was invoked in psychological approaches to decision making early on (Lewin, 1931/1964), no generally accepted measure of conflict strength has been established (Tversky & Shafir, 1992). The present study introduces a model (multiattribute decision field theory) that predicts a decision time pattern depending on the conflict situation. In a risky decision-making experiment with multiattribute choice alternatives, decision time is investigated as a possible measure of conflict strength. It is shown that the model can be fitted to a complex choice pattern.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12747504     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.

Authors:  C A Schreiber; D Kahneman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

2.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.

Authors:  R M Roe; J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Conflict and choice time.

Authors:  D E BERLYNE
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1957-05

4.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions.

Authors:  M F Luce; J R Bettman; J W Payne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.

Authors:  Adele Diederich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Motivation and affective judgments differentially recruit neurons in the primate dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Amemori; Satoko Amemori; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Age, time, and decision making: from processing speed to global time horizons.

Authors:  Corinna E Löckenhoff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Individual differences in the balance of GABA to glutamate in pFC predict the ability to select among competing options.

Authors:  Alejandro de la Vega; Mark S Brown; Hannah R Snyder; Debra Singel; Yuko Munakata; Marie T Banich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  All competition is not alike: neural mechanisms for resolving underdetermined and prepotent competition.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Marie T Banich; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The strategic nature of changing your mind.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Basic psychological needs and neurophysiological responsiveness to decisional conflict: an event-related potential study of integrative self processes.

Authors:  Stefano I Di Domenico; Ada Le; Yichuan Liu; Hasan Ayaz; Marc A Fournier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Decision making: rational or hedonic?

Authors:  Michel Cabanac; Marie-Claude Bonniot-Cabanac
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Harder than expected: increased conflict in clearly disadvantageous delayed choices in a computer game.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse; Susanne Leiberg; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Peter Oswald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.