Literature DB >> 10756485

Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.

C A Schreiber1, D Kahneman.   

Abstract

Retrospective evaluations of aversive episodes were studied in the context of a general model of "judgment by prototype" that has been applied in other situations. Unpleasant sounds of variable loudness and duration were the stimuli. In Experiment 1, continuous reports of annoyance closely tracked variations of noise intensity. Hypotheses about the determinants of retrospective evaluation were examined in Experiment 2. Experiment 3 confirmed a prediction of judgment by prototype: The effects of sound duration and intensity are additive in multitrial experiments. Experiment 4 confirmed a robust preference for aversive episodes that are "improved" by adding a period of reduced aversiveness.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10756485     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  25 in total

1.  Decision making under conflict: decision time as a measure of conflict strength.

Authors:  Adele Diederich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  A test of the peak-end rule with extended autobiographical events.

Authors:  Simon Kemp; Christopher D B Burt; Laura Furneaux
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

3.  Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: the peak-end rule.

Authors:  Amy M Do; Alexander V Rupert; George Wolford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

Review 4.  A Conceptual Neurocognitive Affect-Related Model for the Promotion of Exercise Among Obese Adults.

Authors:  Meghan K Edwards; Ovuokerie Addoh; Skyla M Herod; Ryan E Rhodes; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

5.  Retrospective Valuation of Experienced Outcome Encoded in Distinct Reward Representations in the Anterior Insula and Amygdala.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rhesus monkeys lack a consistent peak-end effect.

Authors:  Eric R Xu; Emily J Knight; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Ending on a high note: adding a better end to effortful study.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Time and decision making in humans.

Authors:  Florian Klapproth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.

Authors:  Leonardo F Andrade; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.