Literature DB >> 12746148

Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study.

B R Holland1, D Penny, M D Hendy.   

Abstract

We conducted a simulation study of the phylogenetic methods UPGMA, neighbor joining, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood for a five-taxon tree under a molecular clock. The parameter space included a small region where maximum parsimony is inconsistent, so we tested inconsistency correction for parsimony and distance correction for neighbor joining. As expected, corrected parsimony was consistent. For these data, maximum likelihood with the clock assumption outperformed each of the other methods tested. The distance-based methods performed marginally better than did maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood without the clock assumption. Data correction was generally detrimental to accuracy, especially for short sequence lengths. We identified another region of the parameter space where, although consistent for a given method, some incorrect trees were each selected with up to twice the frequency of the correct (generating) tree for sequences of bounded length. These incorrect trees are those where the outgroup has been incorrectly placed. In addition to this problem, the placement of the outgroup sequence can have a confounding effect on the ingroup tree, whereby the ingroup is correct when using the ingroup sequences alone, but with the inclusion of the outgroup the ingroup tree becomes incorrect.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746148     DOI: 10.1080/10635150390192771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  27 in total

1.  Biases in phylogenetic estimation can be caused by random sequence segments.

Authors:  Edward Susko; Mathew Spencer; Andrew J Roger
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Charting uncertainty about ant origins.

Authors:  Ross H Crozier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants.

Authors:  Seán G Brady; Ted R Schultz; Brian L Fisher; Philip S Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modeling Hybridization Under the Network Multispecies Coalescent.

Authors:  James H Degnan
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Quintet Rooting: rooting species trees under the multi-species coalescent model.

Authors:  Yasamin Tabatabaee; Kowshika Sarker; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

6.  Phylogenetic tree reconstruction accuracy and model fit when proportions of variable sites change across the tree.

Authors:  Liat Shavit Grievink; David Penny; Michael D Hendy; Barbara R Holland
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  From pairs of most similar sequences to phylogenetic best matches.

Authors:  Peter F Stadler; Manuela Geiß; David Schaller; Alitzel López Sánchez; Marcos González Laffitte; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  An ILP solution for the gene duplication problem.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Chang; Gordon J Burleigh; David F Fernández-Baca; Oliver Eulenstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Evolutionary genomics implies a specific function of Ant4 in mammalian and anole lizard male germ cells.

Authors:  Chae Ho Lim; Takashi Hamazaki; Edward L Braun; Juli Wade; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mind the Outgroup and Bare Branches in Total-Evidence Dating: a Case Study of Pimpliform Darwin Wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).

Authors:  Tamara Spasojevic; Gavin R Broad; Ilari E Sääksjärvi; Martin Schwarz; Masato Ito; Stanislav Korenko; Seraina Klopfstein
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.