Literature DB >> 12745519

Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching.

Thomas J Beckman1, Mark C Lee, Charles H Rohren, V Shane Pankratz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. The Mayo Teaching Evaluation Form (MTEF) is an instrument, based on the Stanford seven-category educational framework, which was developed for the peer review of inpatient teaching. The MTEF has 28 Likert-scaled items derived from the Stanford Faculty Development Program form (SFDP-26), the Mayo electronic evaluation form and three additional items. In this study three physician-evaluators used the MTEF to evaluate 10 attending physicians on the Mayo general internal medicine hospital services. Cronbach's alphas were used to assess the internal consistency of the MTEF, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance was used to summarize the inter-rater reliability. Results of this study reveal that the MTEF is internally consistent, based on average ratings across all evaluators (Cronbach's alpha=0.894). Stanford categories with the highest alphas are Self-Directed Learning, Learning Climate, Communication of Goals, and Evaluation. Categories with lower alphas are Feedback, Understanding and Retention, and Control of Teaching Session. Additionally, the majority of items on the MTEF show significant agreement across all evaluators, and teacher enthusiasm was among the most reliable items. In conclusion, the MTEF is overall internally consistent for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. Hence, the MTEF may be a useful element in the peer evaluation of teaching at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12745519     DOI: 10.1080/0142159031000092508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  18 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Amit K Ghosh; David A Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A Pilot Study of the Creation and Implementation of a Teaching Development Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Jennifer K O'Toole; Melissa D Klein; Daniel McLinden; Heidi Sucharew; Thomas G DeWitt
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; David A Cook; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impact of resident well-being and empathy on assessments of faculty physicians.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Darcy A Reed; Tait D Shanafelt; Colin P West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using social media to improve continuing medical education: a survey of course participants.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Nicole P Sandhu; Christopher M Wittich; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Evaluating Clinical Educators' Competence in an East Asian Context: Who Values What?

Authors:  Chang-Chyi Jenq; Liang-Shiou Ou; Hsu-Min Tseng; Ya-Ping Chao; Jiun-Ren Lin; Lynn V Monrouxe
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

7.  Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Authors:  Macy Stockdill; Bailey Hendricks; Michael D Barnett; Marie Bakitas; Caroline N Harada
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 8.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Peter Iblher; Michaela Zupanic; Christoph Härtel; Hermann Heinze; Peter Schmucker; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-05-16

10.  Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?

Authors:  Renée E Stalmeijer; Diana H J M Dolmans; Ineke H A P Wolfhagen; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.