Literature DB >> 12745434

Three-dimensional simulation of fracture repair in the human tibia.

D Lacroix1, P J Prendergast.   

Abstract

Finite element models of bones can be generated based on images obtained non-invasively in the clinic. One area where such models may prove useful is in the assessment of fracture healing of long bones. To establish the feasibility of such a proposal, a three dimensional finite element model of a fractured tibia was generated, and a model of tissue differentiation and bone regeneration was used to simulate the progress of healing under two different loading magnitudes. Healing is successful under the lower load and unsuccessful under the higher load--this proves that the model has the potential to identify loads that would cause healing to fail. Following a proposal by Richardson et al. [J. Bone Jt Surg. Vol. 76B (1994) pp. 389-394] that the bending stiffness can be used to assess the extent of healing, the bending stiffness was computed during healing--it was shown that the stiffness changed in a similar manner that observed clinically. In conclusion, the paper establishes that 3D computer simulation could be a tool for assessment of the fracture healing under different orthopedic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12745434     DOI: 10.1080/1025584021000025014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  10 in total

1.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Motion Predicts Clinical Callus Formation: Construct-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Jacob Elkins; J Lawrence Marsh; Trevor Lujan; Richard Peindl; James Kellam; Donald D Anderson; William Lack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Reamed intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures: comparison of compression and non-compression nailing.

Authors:  F Högel; C Gerber; V Bühren; P Augat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system.

Authors:  Mario Giorgi; Stefaan W Verbruggen; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2016-09-07

5.  A Novel Design of a Plate for Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fractures Through Traditional Anterolateral Approach.

Authors:  Dong Ren; Yueju Liu; Jian Lu; Runtao Xu; Pengcheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A 3D in Silico Multi-Tissue Evolution Model Highlights the Relevance of Local Strain Accumulation in Bone Fracture Remodeling.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Laurent Corté; Rachele Allena; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  A preclinical model of post-surgery secondary bone healing for subtrochanteric femoral fracture based on fuzzy interpretations.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Multiphase modelling of the effect of fluid shear stress on cell yield and distribution in a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Natalie C Pearson; Sarah L Waters; James M Oliver; Rebecca J Shipley
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-09-12

9.  A Computed Microtomography Method for Understanding Epiphyseal Growth Plate Fusion.

Authors:  Katherine A Staines; Kamel Madi; Behzad Javaheri; Peter D Lee; Andrew A Pitsillides
Journal:  Front Mater       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.515

10.  Three-dimensional computational model simulating the fracture healing process with both biphasic poroelastic finite element analysis and fuzzy logic control.

Authors:  Monan Wang; Ning Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.