Literature DB >> 12743534

Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing.

Elizabeth Valentine-Thon1, Hans-Walter Schiwara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to evaluate the reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the MELISA Test for detecting metal sensitivity in patients with clinical symptoms of a type IV hypersensitivity to metal.
DESIGN: Blood from 250 patients was tested in MELISA against up to 20 different metals in 2 to 3 concentrations. The frequency and distribution of metal reactivities, the sensitivity and specificity of nickel reactivity in patients with and without confirmed or suspected sensitivity to nickel, and the roles of lymphocyte concentration and concentration of inorganic mercury were analyzed. In addition, for reproducibility testing, 196 metal tests were performed in duplicate, and intra- and interassay variations of MELISA results were examined in patients patch-test positive for the relevant metal.
RESULTS: Among the 250 patients, reactivity to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or > or = 5 metals was 26%, 36%, 15%, 12%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. Reactivity was most frequent to nickel (73%), followed by titanium (42%), cadmium (18%) gold (17%), palladium (13%), lead (11%), beryllium (9%), inorganic mercury (8%), tin (8%), and phenylmercury (6%). All patients (n=15) with confirmed or suspected nickel allergy were positive in MELISA, while patients with no suspicion of nickel allergy were either negative (n=6) or very low positive (n=4) in MELISA. MELISA reactivity is directly dependent on lymphocyte concentration: the higher the lymphocyte concentration per test, the stronger the reactivity. Concentrations of inorganic mercury > 0.5 microg/ml cause non antigen-specific (mitogenic) reactions in a majority of patients. The reproducibility rate was 94% using a cut-off of Stimulation Index > or = 3 or 99% using a cut-off of > or = 5. While the absolute intra- and interassay Stimulation Index values may vary, the qualitative results are highly reproducible.
CONCLUSION: The MELISA Test is reproducible, sensitive, specific, and reliable for detecting metal sensitivity in metal-sensitive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12743534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Endocrinol Lett        ISSN: 0172-780X            Impact factor:   0.765


  18 in total

1.  Diagnostic use of the lymphocyte transformation test-memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay in confirming active Lyme borreliosis in clinically and serologically ambiguous cases.

Authors:  Basant K Puri; Daniel Rm Segal; Jean A Monro
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 2.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

3.  Postoperative spinal infection mimicking systemic vasculitis with titanium-spinal implants.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; Erato Atsali; Konstantinos Starantzis; Chrysanthi Batistaki; Triantafyllia Brozou; Panayiotis Pantos; Konstantinos Stathopoulos; Konstantinos Soultanis
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-09-13

4.  [In vitro testing for allergic contact dermatitis].

Authors:  R Brehler; H Merk
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Lymphocyte proliferative response to Helicobacter pylori antigens in H. pylori-infected patients.

Authors:  M Hybenova; P Hrda; B Potuznikova; E Pavlik; V Stejskal; J Dosedel; I Sterzl
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Lymphocyte transformation test reveals low prevalence of true metal hypersensitivity among pre-operative total knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Tarek Boutefnouchet; Francis Vallières; Josee Delisle; Mohamed Benderdour; Julio C Fernandes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe?

Authors:  Matej Skocaj; Metka Filipic; Jana Petkovic; Sasa Novak
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission.

Authors:  Joachim Mutter
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Response of osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia to bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Han; Kyoung-Hwa Kim; Jung-Seok Han; Ki-Tae Koo; Tae-Il Kim; Yang-Jo Seol; Yong-Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.