Literature DB >> 12740655

Usefulness of tumor volumetry as a prognostic factor of survival in head and neck cancer.

Ralf Kurek1, Anna Kalogera-Fountzila, Klaus Muskalla, Urania Dafni, Thomas Schnabel, Bernhard Kober, Sandra Röddiger, Thomas Martin, George Fountzilas, Nikolaos Zamboglou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The TNM classification system of tumor stage does not always reflect the actual tumor mass present at diagnosis. This study aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of volumetric data regarding survival in head and neck cancer patients being treated with either cisplatin or carboplatin administered concomitantly with radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients suffering from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in a Greek-German cooperative study (see Table 1). All patients were treated by radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. 65 patients received chemotherapy with carboplatin and 42 with cisplatin. More than 6,200 CT scans were analyzed by digitalization of contours which subsequently led to the computation of the tumor volume (primary and macroscopic lymph node metastases).
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 43 months and median survival 30 months. Median initial tumor volume was 32.5 ml (range 2.1-220.1 ml) in the carboplatin and 44.4 ml (range 3.2-202.5 ml) in the cisplatin group (see Figure 1). After treatment, tumor volumes did not differ significantly (median of 3.1 ml [range 0.0-167.1 ml] and 3.5 ml [range 0.0-166.0 ml], respectively). 41 patients (63.1%) died in the carboplatin group and 22 patients (52.4%) in the cisplatin group (see Figure 2). Pretherapeutic tumor volume was prognostic with respect to survival while TNM classification and age were not. Pretherapeutic tumor volume was negatively and percent decrease in tumor volume positively associated with survival (see Tables 2 and 3).
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the initial tumor volume adds valuable information in terms of prognosis. Initial tumor volume should be included in all future clinical trials regarding head and neck cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12740655     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-003-1017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  15 in total

1.  Prediction of treatment response in head and neck cancer by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tedros Bezabeh; Olva Odlum; Richard Nason; Paul Kerr; Donna Sutherland; Rakesh Patel; Ian C P Smith
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Impact of tumor control and presence of visible necrosis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Kuhnt; Arndt-Christian Mueller; Tanja Pelz; Gabriele Haensgen; Marc Bloching; Sabrina Koesling; Johannes Schubert; Juergen Dunst
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The relationship between nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor volume and TNM T-classification: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Yin Zhou; Vincent F H Chong; James B K Khoo; Kap-Luk Chan; Jing Huang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluating lingual carcinoma for surgical management: what does volumetric measurement with MRI offer?

Authors:  P W Boland; S R Watt-Smith; K Pataridis; C Alvey; S J Golding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Impact of initial tumor volume on radiotherapy outcome in patients with T2 glottic cancer.

Authors:  T Rutkowski
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Importance of tumor volume in supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L W van Bockel; E M Monninkhof; F A Pameijer; C H J Terhaard
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Clinical applications of tumor volume measurements for predicting outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Suresh K Mukherji; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Jonas Castelijns; Anthony A Mancuso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  The importance of tumor volume in the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma: comparison of computerized volumetry and geometric models.

Authors:  Georgios Iliadis; Panagiotis Selviaridis; Anna Kalogera-Fountzila; Anna Fragkoulidi; Dimos Baltas; Nikolaos Tselis; Athanasios Chatzisotiriou; Despina Misailidou; Nikolaos Zamboglou; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Prognostic role of tumor volume for radiotherapy outcome in patient with T2 laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  T Rutkowski; A Wygoda; K Składowski; B Hejduk; R Rutkowski; Z Kołosza; B Maciejewski
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Volumetric and MGMT parameters in glioblastoma patients: survival analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Iliadis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Athanasios Chatzisotiriou; Despina Televantou; Anastasia G Eleftheraki; Sofia Lambaki; Despina Misailidou; Panagiotis Selviaridis; George Fountzilas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.