Literature DB >> 12740406

Spatial memory following shifts of gaze. I. Saccades to memorized world-fixed and gaze-fixed targets.

Justin T Baker1, Timothy M Harper, Lawrence H Snyder.   

Abstract

During a shift of gaze, an object can move along with gaze or stay fixed in the world. To examine the effect of an object's reference frame on spatial working memory, we trained monkeys to memorize locations of visual stimuli as either fixed in the world or fixed to gaze. Each trial consisted of an initial reference frame instruction, followed by a peripheral visual flash, a memory-period gaze shift, and finally a memory-guided saccade to the location consistent with the instructed reference frame. The memory-period gaze shift was either rapid (a saccade) or slow (smooth pursuit or whole body rotation). This design allowed a comparison of memory-guided saccade performance under various conditions. Our data indicate that after a rotation or smooth-pursuit eye movement, saccades to memorized world-fixed targets are more variable than saccades to memorized gaze-fixed targets. In contrast, memory-guided saccades to world- and gaze-fixed targets are equally variable following a visually guided saccade. Across all conditions, accuracy, latency, and main sequence characteristics of memory-guided saccades are not influenced by the target's reference frame. Memory-guided saccades are, however, more accurate after fast compared with slow gaze shifts. These results are most consistent with an eye-centered representational system for storing the spatial locations of memorized objects but suggest that the visual system may engage different mechanisms to update the stored signal depending on how gaze is shifted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12740406     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00610.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Frédéric P Rey; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Parallel updating and weighting of multiple spatial maps for visual stability during whole body motion.

Authors:  J J Tramper; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Involvement of the central thalamus in the control of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A model that integrates eye velocity commands to keep track of smooth eye displacements.

Authors:  Gunnar Blohm; Lance M Optican; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Spatial constancy and the brain: insights from neural networks.

Authors:  Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. III. From neurons to behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca A Berman; Laura M Heiser; Catherine A Dunn; Richard C Saunders; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Subthreshold microstimulation in frontal eye fields updates spatial memories.

Authors:  Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; A Bryan; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Spatial constancy mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.