Literature DB >> 12739743

Macroprolactinemia: predictability on clinical basis and detection by PEG precipitation with two different immunometric methods.

P Amadori1, C Dilberis, A Marcolla, M Pinamonti, P Menapace, F Dal Bosco.   

Abstract

Prolactin (PRL) in human serum is present in three species: monomeric PRL (23 kDA), big PRL (50-60 kDa) and big, big PRL (bb-PRL or macroprolactinemia) of 150-170 kDa. Macroprolactin seems to be mainly composed of a molecule of monomeric PRL and an immunoglobulin G anti PRL. Its biological activity is considered low or absent, but it is measured, at various degrees, by the immunoassay method, thus causing diagnostic problems. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) has been employed to precipitate macroprolactin, allowing its detection. This method is not applicable to all immunoassays for technical reasons. Our aim was to evaluate: 1) the predictability of macroprolactin on a clinical basis; 2) the possibility of applying PEG precipitation to Abbott AxSYM analyzer beside Roche Elecsys (already approved). We classified 34 hyperprolactinemic women, on a clinical and imaging basis, in four groups: A: functional hyperprolactinemia; B: pituitary lesions hyperprolactinemia; C: probably macroprolactinemia; D: unclassifiable hyperprolactinemia and a "control" group E of 19 healthy women. PRL was assayed, both with Elecsys and AxSYM, before and after PEG serum treatment. Eleven out of twelve group C, and 5/7 group D patients showed macroprolactinemia, against 1/7 in A and 1/8 in B. PEG was suitable for AxSYM only after the same treatment of the calibration standards, thus performing outcomes overlapping Elecsys. For clinical purposes, in the presence of macroprolactinemia, besides the recovery ratio, molar or ponderal monomeric PRL assay should be calculated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12739743     DOI: 10.1007/BF03345144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  27 in total

1.  Prolactin results for samples containing macroprolactin are method and sample dependent.

Authors:  G Gilson; P Schmit; J Thix; J P Hoffman; R L Humbel
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Free prolactin determinations in hyperprolactinemic men with suspicion of macroprolactinemia.

Authors:  Rémy Sapin; Françoise Gasser; Daniel Grucker
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Heterogeneity of serum prolactin throughout the menstrual cycle and pregnancy in hyperprolactinemic women with normal ovarian function.

Authors:  F Larrea; A Escorza; A Valero; L Hernandez; M C Cravioto; V Diaz-Sanchez
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Biologic activity and plasma clearance of prolactin-IgG complex in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  A Leaños-Miranda; K A Chávez-Rueda; F Blanco-Favela
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-04

Review 5.  Endogenous antibodies against prolactin--a "new" cause of hyperprolactinemia.

Authors:  G Lindstedt
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.664

6.  Bioactivity of prolactin in a woman with an excess of large molecular size prolactin, persistent hyperprolactinemia and spontaneous conception.

Authors:  A N Andersen; H Pedersen; H Djursing; B N Andersen; H G Friesen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Laboratory and clinical experience in 55 patients with macroprolactinemia identified by a simple polyethylene glycol precipitation method.

Authors:  H Leslie; C H Courtney; P M Bell; D R Hadden; D R McCance; P K Ellis; B Sheridan; A B Atkinson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Prolactin and growth hormone: molecular heterogeneity and measurement in serum.

Authors:  C R Smith; M R Norman
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.057

9.  Correlation of the antibody titers with serum prolactin levels and their clinical course in patients with anti-prolactin autoantibody.

Authors:  N Hattori; K Ikekubo; T Ishihara; K Moridera; M Hino; H Kurahachi
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.664

10.  The frequency of macroprolactinemia in pregnant women and the heterogeneity of its etiologies.

Authors:  N Hattori
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [The "incorrect" laboratory result. II: Common misinterpretations of laboratory results].

Authors:  J Thiery; G M Fiedler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Prevalence of pituitary adenomas in macroprolactinemic patients may be higher than it is presumed.

Authors:  Gonca Tamer; Ayşegül Telci; Meral Mert; Ayse Kubat Uzum; Ferihan Aral; Refik Tanakol; Sema Yarman; Harika Boztepe; Nese Colak; Faruk Alagöl
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Identification of IgG-immunocomplex macroprolactin with an immunometric "sandwich" system: technical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  P Amadori; C Dilberis; A Marcolla; M Pinamonti; P Menapace; A Valentini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.256

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.