Literature DB >> 12739685

Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).

Diana Ran1, Benjamin Peretz.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the reaction of children, who received a local anesthesia to the upper incisors with a conventional buccal infiltration and a periodontal ligament injection (PDLi) with a computerized device (Wand); to assess the efficacy of the anesthesia and the reactions by children after treatment. Ninety-eight children aged 2 to 4 years participated in the study. All the children were sedated with hydroxyzine and nitrous oxide. Children were randomly assigned to receive either PDLi with the Wand or conventional infiltration. During the injection, a modified Behavioral Pain Scale was used. There were 21 girls and 23 boys between the ages of 2 to 4 years in the study group (mean age 3.9 +/- 1.3 years), and 16 girls and 29 boys (mean age 3.5 +/- 1.0 years) in the control group. No significant difference was found between boys and girls. More children reacted negatively, namely, crying, facial expressions and eyes squeezed, while receiving the conventional infiltrative injection, whereas children, who received the anesthetic solution using the Wand, reacted more positively. This difference was statistically significant. No significant difference regarding the efficacy of the anesthesia was observed in either technique. Eighty percent of the children who receive the conventional buccal infiltration scratched the nose or upper lip after the treatment, while none of the children, who received PDLi, showed signs of discomfort. Children displayed better behavior when they received local anesthesia with the Wand rather than with the conventional infiltration. The same efficacy of anesthesia was achieved with both techniques. Children did not show signs of discomfort after treatment with the Wand, whereas they did while receiving conventional injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12739685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Jeffrey Berlin; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel M Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

2.  Comparison of Pain Perception Using Conventional Versus Computer-Controlled Intraligamentary Local Anesthetic Injection for Extraction of Primary Molars.

Authors:  Meenu Mittal; Radhika Chopra; Ashok Kumar; Dhirendra Srivastava
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

3.  A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections.

Authors:  Eliezer Kaufman; Joel B Epstein; Eitan Naveh; Meir Gorsky; Anat Gross; Galit Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

4.  A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique.

Authors:  J F Tahmassebi; M Nikolaou; M S Duggal
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-06

5.  Alleviating Pain in Oculoplastic Procedures by Reducing the Rate of Injection of Local Anaesthetic.

Authors:  Aditi Gupta; Paul J Tomlins; Aaron T W Ng; Tristan T Q Reuser
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2015-11-04

6.  Effectiveness of audiovisual distraction eyewear and computerized delivery of anesthesia during pulp therapy of primary molars in phobic child patients.

Authors:  Kausar Sadia Fakhruddin; El Batawi Hisham; Mehmet Omer Gorduysus
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  Local Anaesthetic Drug Administration in Dentistry Using Computer Assisted Anaesthetic Delivery System: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Kannan Sridharan
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-08-31

8.  Comparison of the pain levels of computer-controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in prosthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Murat Yenisey
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Effectiveness of audiovisual distraction with computerized delivery of anesthesia during the placement of stainless steel crowns in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kausar Sadia Fakhruddin; Hisham El Batawi; M O Gorduysus
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.