Literature DB >> 12736834

Training mode does not affect orthostatic tolerance in chronically exercising subjects.

Warren D Franke1, Kimberly K Mills, Kichang Lee, Juliane P Hernandez.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypotheses that trained swimmers would have greater orthostatic tolerance than runners and, if present, it would be due to differences in their autonomic and hemodynamic responses to graded central hypovolemia. Twenty intercollegiate male athletes [11 runners and 9 swimmers; .VO(2max) =70.0 (1.6) vs 69.5 (2.6) ml.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively] underwent graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) to presyncope. The swimmers were heavier [80.5 (1.9) vs 70.3 (1.9) kg, P<0.05], with larger resting cardiac [4.44 (0.29) vs 3.68 (0.18) l.min(-1).m(-2)] and total peripheral conductance [0.056 (0.04) vs 0.044 (0.02) units.m(-2)] indices. Neither spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (sequence method) nor heart rate variability (spectral analysis) differed significantly between groups at rest. LBNP tolerance did not differ between groups, with an index value of 51 (2) kPa.min for the runners and 54 (4) kPa.min for the swimmers [383 (16) vs 402 (32) mmHg.min], although the swimmers had larger declines in pulse pressure and tended ( P=0.078) to have larger declines in total peripheral conductance index in the last completed stage of LBNP. These responses did not differ between groups in the last 2 min of LBNP. Neither the heart rate, mean arterial pressure nor forearm vascular conductance responses differed between groups throughout. Changes in heart rate variability indices did not differ significantly between groups, with similar declines in the high frequency component and increases in the low frequency/high frequency ratio. These data suggest that swim training does not lead to greater orthostatic tolerance than run training, and responses to maximal LBNP do not differ between swimmers and runners. Moreover, neither heart rate nor the autonomic modulation of the heart rate response to LBNP are affected by training modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736834     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0770-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular drift during prolonged exercise: new perspectives.

Authors:  E F Coyle; J González-Alonso
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Postural specificity of cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training.

Authors:  C A Ray; K J Cureton; H G Ouzts
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-12

3.  Sympatho-vagal responses in humans to thermoneutral head-out water immersion.

Authors:  C Miwa; Y Sugiyama; T Mano; S Iwase; T Matsukawa
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-12

4.  Effects of exercise training mode on the cardiovascular responses to lower body negative pressure in males.

Authors:  M V Ioudina; W D Franke
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1998-01

5.  Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing.

Authors:  G Parati; R Casadei; A Groppelli; M Di Rienzo; G Mancia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Hemodynamic and respiratory responses compared in swimming and running.

Authors:  I Holmér; E M Stein; B Saltin; B Ekblom; P O Astrand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Unaltered norepinephrine-heart rate relationship in exercise with exogenous heat.

Authors:  L B Rowell; G L Brengelmann; P R Freund
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-02

Review 8.  Regulation of central blood volume and cardiac filling in endurance athletes: the Frank-Starling mechanism as a determinant of orthostatic tolerance.

Authors:  B D Levine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Physical fitness and cardiovascular response to lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  P B Raven; D Rohm-Young; C G Blomqvist
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-01

10.  Running on land and in water: comparative exercise physiology.

Authors:  J Svedenhag; J Seger
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exercise training and orthostatic intolerance: a paradox?

Authors:  Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Interactions between exposure to hypoxia and the training-induced autonomic adaptations in a "live high-train low" session.

Authors:  Jérémy Cornolo; Jean-Pierre Fouillot; Laurent Schmitt; Camillo Povea; Paul Robach; Jean-Paul Richalet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Artificial gravity as a countermeasure to microgravity: a pilot study examining the effects on knee extensor and plantar flexor muscle groups.

Authors:  V J Caiozzo; F Haddad; S Lee; M Baker; William Paloski; K M Baldwin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-03-12

Review 4.  A definition of normovolaemia and consequences for cardiovascular control during orthostatic and environmental stress.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Morten Bundgaard-Nielsen; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Artificial gravity with ergometric exercise as a countermeasure against cardiovascular deconditioning during 4 days of head-down bed rest in humans.

Authors:  Yong-Chun Wang; Chang-Bin Yang; Yan-Hong Wu; Yuan Gao; Dong-Yuan Lu; Fei Shi; Xiao-Ming Wei; Xi-Qing Sun
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Heart rate variability and swimming.

Authors:  Julian Koenig; Marc N Jarczok; Mieke Wasner; Thomas K Hillecke; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.