Literature DB >> 12736133

Evidence of Common Timing Processes in the Control of Manual, Orofacial, and Speech Movements.

E. A. Franz1, H. N. Zelaznik, A. Smith.   

Abstract

Recent investigations of timing in motor control have been interpreted as support for the concept of brain modularity. According to this concept, the brain is organized into functional modules that contain mechanisms responsible for general processes. Keele and colleagues (Keele & Hawkins, 1982; Keele & Ivry, 1987; Keele, Ivry, & Pokorny, 1987; Keele, Pokorny, Corcos, & Ivry, 1985) demonstrated that the within-subject variability in. cycle duration of repetitive movements is correlated across finger, forearm, and foot movements, providing evidence in support of a general timing module. The present study examines the notion of timing modularity of speech and nonspeech movements of the oral motor system as well as the manual motor system. Subjects produced repetitive movements with the finger, forearm, and jaw. In addition, a fourth task involved the repetition of a syllable. All tasks were to be produced with a 400-ms cycle duration; target duration was established with a pacing tone, which then was removed. For each task, the within-subject variability of the cycle duration was computed for the unpaced movements over 20 trials. Significant correlations were found between each pair of effectors and tasks. The present results provide evidence that common timing processes are involved not only in movements of the limbs, but also in speech and nonspeech movements of oral structures.

Year:  1992        PMID: 12736133     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1992.9941623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  11 in total

1.  Individual differences in timing of discrete and continuous movements: a dimensional approach.

Authors:  H Lorås; A K Stensdotter; F Öhberg; H Sigmundsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Corrective jitter motion shows similar individual frequencies for the arm and the finger.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Uri Alon; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Nonspeech Oral Movements and Oral Motor Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ray D Kent
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Visuomotor learning generalizes between bilateral and unilateral conditions despite varying degrees of bilateral interference.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; J Toby Mordkoff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Brainstem reflexes in patients with familial dysautonomia.

Authors:  Joel V Gutiérrez; Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval?

Authors:  Susan Ravizza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

9.  Substantial generalization of sensorimotor learning from bilateral to unilateral movement conditions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Khongchee Xiong; Katie Marek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging evidence for a deficit in brain timing networks in stuttering: a hypothesis and theory.

Authors:  Andrew C Etchell; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.