Literature DB >> 12736102

Molecular biomarkers of colorectal carcinogenesis and their role in surveillance and early intervention.

G Garcea1, R A Sharma, A Dennison, W P Steward, A Gescher, D P Berry.   

Abstract

Modern medicine is increasingly focused towards population surveillance for disease, coupled with the implementation of preventative measures applied to 'at-risk' patients. Surveillance in colorectal cancer is limited by the cost and risk of endoscopy. Trials of putative chemopreventive agents in colorectal cancer are hampered by difficulties in following up large cohorts of patients over long periods of time to ascertain the clinical effect. Research into possible pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis has revealed a range of biological intermediates which could be used in surveillance, the identification of high risk populations and early diagnosis of cancer. The aim of this paper was to review the possible role of biomarkers in surveillance and the timing of intervention. A literature review using both Medline and Web of Science was performed from 1995 onwards using keywords: biomarkers, colorectal cancer, carcinogenesis, chemoprevention, surveillance and screening. Research has identified many potential biomarkers, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), oxidative DNA adducts and glutathione S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms, which could be applied in a clinical setting to screen for and detect colorectal cancer. Molecular biomarkers, such as COX-2, oxidative DNA adducts and GST polymorphisms offer new prospects in the detection of early colorectal cancer, surveillance of high-risk populations and prediction of the clinical effectiveness of chemopreventive drugs. Their role could be extended into surgical surveillance for potentially operable disease and post-operative follow-up for disease recurrence. Research should be directed at assessing complementary biomarkers to increase clinical effectiveness in determining management options for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736102     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00027-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  Study on the association of COX-2 genetic polymorphisms with risk of gastric cancer in high incidence Hexi area of Gansu province in China.

Authors:  Zhu Ke-Xiang; Li Yu-Min; Li Xun; Zhou Wen-Ce; Shan Yong; Liu Tao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and digestive tract cancers: a perspective.

Authors:  Deacqunita L Diggs; Ashley C Huderson; Kelly L Harris; Jeremy N Myers; Leah D Banks; Perumalla V Rekhadevi; Mohammad S Niaz; Aramandla Ramesh
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  -765G > C COX-2 polymorphism may be a susceptibility marker for gastric adenocarcinoma in patients with atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.

Authors:  Carina Pereira; Hugo Sousa; Paula Ferreira; Maria Fragoso; Luís Moreira-Dias; Carlos Lopes; Rui Medeiros; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo using a targeted heptapeptide and confocal microendoscopy.

Authors:  Pei-Lin Hsiung; Pei-Lei Hsiung; Jonathan Hardy; Shai Friedland; Roy Soetikno; Christine B Du; Amy P Wu; Peyman Sahbaie; James M Crawford; Anson W Lowe; Christopher H Contag; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Polymorphism of -765G > C COX-2 is a risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma and peptic ulcer disease in addition to H pylori infection: a study from northern India.

Authors:  Ashish Saxena; Kashi-Nath Prasad; Uday-Chand Ghoshal; Monty-Roshan Bhagat; Narendra Krishnani; Nuzhat Husain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Oxidative DNA damage and β-catenin expression in colorectal cancer evolution.

Authors:  Denise G Priolli; Thamy P Canelloi; Camila O Lopes; Júlio C M Valdívia; Natalia P Martinez; Demetrius P Açari; Izilda A Cardinalli; Marcelo L Ribeiro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  In vivo biomarkers for targeting colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Pei-Lin Hsiung; Thomas Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

9.  Optical tecnology developments in biomedicine: history, current and future.

Authors:  Shoko Nioka; Yu Chen
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2011-10-17

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer: imaging surveillance following resection of primary tumour.

Authors:  Ken Miles; Guy Burkill
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.